2013•Scientia HorticulturaeOpen access

Fruit load restricts the flowering promotion effect of paclobutrazol in alternate bearing Citrus spp.

A. Martínez‐Fuentes, Carlos Mesejo, Natalia Muñoz‐Fambuena, Carmina Reig, M. C. González, Domingo J. Iglesias, Eduardo Primo‐Millo, Manuel Agustí

Open full text 43 citations

Abstract

The floral bud inductive period, PBZ promotes flowering in Citrus; however, our results indicate that this effect is fruit-load dependant. In ‘Salustiana’ and ‘Navelina’ sweet oranges, ‘Hernandina’ Clementine mandarin, and ‘Afourer’ and ‘Moncada’ hybrids, flowering intensity significantly increased the following spring for medium-to-low fruit-load trees treated with either 1–10 g PBZ tree−1 applied to the soil or 15 g tree−1 sprayed on the canopy. PBZ significantly increased the percentage of sprouted buds and leafless floral shoots (both single-flowered shoots and inflorescences) and reduced the number of vegetative shoots. By contrast, heavy fruit load trees receiving the same amount of PBZ in the same season or at floral bud differentiation period scarcely flowered. Fruit nullified the effect of PBZ irrespective to treatment date (inductive period or bud burst) as well as the dose applied (1, 10 or 15 g tree−1) or the treatment method (soil application or canopy spraying). In conclusion, the effectiveness of PBZ in promoting flowering in Citrus depends on the fruit load since the tree showed a cultivar-dependant threshold value above which PBZ is unable to promote flowering.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The floral bud inductive period, PBZ promotes flowering in Citrus; however, our results indicate that this effect is fruit-load dependant. In ‘Salustiana’ and ‘Navelina’ sweet oranges, ‘Hernandina’ Clementine mandarin, and ‘Afourer’ and ‘Moncada’ hybrids, flowering intensity significantly increased the following spring for medium-to-low fruit-load trees treated with either 1–10 g PBZ tree−1 applied to the soil or 15 g tree−1 sprayed on the canopy. PBZ significantly increased the percentage of sprouted buds and leafless floral shoots (both single-flowered shoots and inflorescences) and reduced the number of vegetative shoots. By contrast, heavy fruit load trees receiving the same amount of PBZ in the same season or at floral bud differentiation period scarcely flowered. Fruit nullified the effect of PBZ irrespective to treatment date (inductive period or bud burst) as well as the dose applied (1, 10 or 15 g tree−1) or the treatment method (soil application or canopy spraying). In conclusion, the effectiveness of PBZ in promoting flowering in Citrus depends on the fruit load since the tree showed a cultivar-dependant threshold value above which PBZ is unable to promote flowering.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The floral bud inductive period, PBZ promotes flowering in Citrus; however, our results indicate that this effect is fruit-load dependant. In ‘Salustiana’ and ‘Navelina’ sweet oranges, ‘Hernandina’ Clementine mandarin, and ‘Afourer’ and ‘Moncada’ hybrids, flowering intensity significantly increased the following spring for medium-to-low fruit-load trees treated with either 1–10 g PBZ tree−1 applied to the soil or 15 g tree−1 sprayed on the canopy. PBZ significantly increased the percentage of sprouted buds and leafless floral shoots (both single-flowered shoots and inflorescences) and reduced the number of vegetative shoots. By contrast, heavy fruit load trees receiving the same amount of PBZ in the same season or at floral bud differentiation period scarcely flowered. Fruit nullified the effect of PBZ irrespective to treatment date (inductive period or bud burst) as well as the dose applied (1, 10 or 15 g tree−1) or the treatment method (soil application or canopy spraying). In conclusion, the effectiveness of PBZ in promoting flowering in Citrus depends on the fruit load since the tree showed a cultivar-dependant threshold value above which PBZ is unable to promote flowering.

Key concepts: Paclobutrazol, Biology, Shoot, Inflorescence, Horticulture, Canopy, Bud, Cultivar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fruit load restricts the flowering promotion effect of paclobutrazol in alternate bearing Citrus spp. — Research Paper | ScholarLens