1987Journal of Soil ScienceRequires access

The solution chemistry of podzolic soils from the eastern Canadian shield: a thermodynamic interpretation of the mineral phases controlling soluble Al 3+ andH 4 SiO 4

E. P. MANLEY, Ward Chesworth, L. J. Evans

Open publisher page 41 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY Thirty‐one soil solutions were extracted by immiscible displacement with CCl 4 under high speed centrifugation from sub‐horizons of three podzolic soils from north‐eastern Ontario, Canada. The solutions were analysed for major cations and anions and a speciation of dissolved Fe and Al was attempted to distinguish ‘free’, ‘organically bound’ and ‘inorganically bound’ species. Results indicated that the Ae (E) horizon solutions were of low pH and contained mainly organically bound Fe and Al. With depth, p Hs increased, ionic strengths decreased and the relative proportion of inorganically bound Fe and Al increased. Although application of phase diagrams permitted only a semi‐quantitative interpretation of the data, all horizon solutions, with the exception of some Ae solutions, appeared supersaturated with respect to likely occurring crystalline and amorphous aluminosilicates [kaolinite, halloysite, allophane (Al:Si=l) and imogolite]. Of the phases considered, reactions involving imogolite‐allophane, gibbsite‐halloysite, gibbsite‐allophane and gibbsite‐imogolite all appeared reasonable in controlling the content of Al 3+ and H 4 SiO 4 in solution, although the presence of gibbsite and imogolite could not be definitely confirmed in these soils.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY Thirty‐one soil solutions were extracted by immiscible displacement with CCl 4 under high speed centrifugation from sub‐horizons of three podzolic soils from north‐eastern Ontario, Canada. The solutions were analysed for major cations and anions and a speciation of dissolved Fe and Al was attempted to distinguish ‘free’, ‘organically bound’ and ‘inorganically bound’ species. Results indicated that the Ae (E) horizon solutions were of low pH and contained mainly organically bound Fe and Al. With depth, p Hs increased, ionic strengths decreased and the relative proportion of inorganically bound Fe and Al increased. Although application of phase diagrams permitted only a semi‐quantitative interpretation of the data, all horizon solutions, with the exception of some Ae solutions, appeared supersaturated with respect to likely occurring crystalline and amorphous aluminosilicates [kaolinite, halloysite, allophane (Al:Si=l) and imogolite]. Of the phases considered, reactions involving imogolite‐allophane, gibbsite‐halloysite, gibbsite‐allophane and gibbsite‐imogolite all appeared reasonable in controlling the content of Al 3+ and H 4 SiO 4 in solution, although the presence of gibbsite and imogolite could not be definitely confirmed in these soils.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY Thirty‐one soil solutions were extracted by immiscible displacement with CCl 4 under high speed centrifugation from sub‐horizons of three podzolic soils from north‐eastern Ontario, Canada. The solutions were analysed for major cations and anions and a speciation of dissolved Fe and Al was attempted to distinguish ‘free’, ‘organically bound’ and ‘inorganically bound’ species. Results indicated that the Ae (E) horizon solutions were of low pH and contained mainly organically bound Fe and Al. With depth, p Hs increased, ionic strengths decreased and the relative proportion of inorganically bound Fe and Al increased. Although application of phase diagrams permitted only a semi‐quantitative interpretation of the data, all horizon solutions, with the exception of some Ae solutions, appeared supersaturated with respect to likely occurring crystalline and amorphous aluminosilicates [kaolinite, halloysite, allophane (Al:Si=l) and imogolite]. Of the phases considered, reactions involving imogolite‐allophane, gibbsite‐halloysite, gibbsite‐allophane and gibbsite‐imogolite all appeared reasonable in controlling the content of Al 3+ and H 4 SiO 4 in solution, although the presence of gibbsite and imogolite could not be definitely confirmed in these soils.

Key concepts: Allophane, Gibbsite, Imogolite, Halloysite, Kaolinite, Chemistry, Aluminosilicate, Soil water

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The solution chemistry of podzolic soils from the eastern Canadian shield: a thermodynamic interpretation of the mineral phases controlling soluble Al 3+ andH 4 SiO 4 — Research Paper | ScholarLens