2006•Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparative Performance and Complexity Study of Short-Length LDPC and Turbo Product Codes

Mohamed Adnan Landolsi

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative performance and complexity study between low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes and turbo product codes (TPC) of short block length (within 2048 bits). The LDPC codes are of the semi-random (SR) type, characterized by low encoder complexity, and are further optimized by eliminating short cycles of length 4 (minimum girth 6). The TPC codes are obtained from 2D and 3D constructions chosen to match the LDPC codes' parameters. The numerical results show that the SR-LDPC codes have slightly better error performance (to within 0.5dB at a BER of 10-5while demonstrating lower computational complexity per decoder iteration but the required number of decoding iterations is larger. However, this disadvantage is significantly reduced for moderately high signal-to-noise ratios (starting from 2.5dB). It is therefore concluded that SR-LDPC codes have a more competitive performance-complexity advantage overall

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a comparative performance and complexity study between low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes and turbo product codes (TPC) of short block length (within 2048 bits). The LDPC codes are of the semi-random (SR) type, characterized by low encoder complexity, and are further optimized by eliminating short cycles of length 4 (minimum girth 6). The TPC codes are obtained from 2D and 3D constructions chosen to match the LDPC codes' parameters. The numerical results show that the SR-LDPC codes have slightly better error performance (to within 0.5dB at a BER of 10-5while demonstrating lower computational complexity per decoder iteration but the required number of decoding iterations is larger. However, this disadvantage is significantly reduced for moderately high signal-to-noise ratios (starting from 2.5dB). It is therefore concluded that SR-LDPC codes have a more competitive performance-complexity advantage overall

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a comparative performance and complexity study between low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes and turbo product codes (TPC) of short block length (within 2048 bits). The LDPC codes are of the semi-random (SR) type, characterized by low encoder complexity, and are further optimized by eliminating short cycles of length 4 (minimum girth 6). The TPC codes are obtained from 2D and 3D constructions chosen to match the LDPC codes' parameters. The numerical results show that the SR-LDPC codes have slightly better error performance (to within 0.5dB at a BER of 10-5while demonstrating lower computational complexity per decoder iteration but the required number of decoding iterations is larger. However, this disadvantage is significantly reduced for moderately high signal-to-noise ratios (starting from 2.5dB). It is therefore concluded that SR-LDPC codes have a more competitive performance-complexity advantage overall

Key concepts: Turbo code, Low-density parity-check code, Serial concatenated convolutional codes, Computer science, Turbo, Concatenated error correction code, Turbo equalizer, Product (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Performance and Complexity Study of Short-Length LDPC and Turbo Product Codes — Research Paper | ScholarLens