1953The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaOpen access

On the Specification of Zero Hearing Loss

J. Donald Harris, Cecil K. Myers, Claire E. White

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Several dozen young healthy men, aged 17–25 with negative auditory history, were used to determine SPL under a PDR-8 earphone at threshold for each of 8 frequencies. Careful psychophysical techniques were used, and a calibrated sound probe was used to measure SPL. In addition, an audiogram was taken by a common clinical technique. Average SPL of our population differs only a very few db from previous sound probe studies, being 12–20 db fainter than audiometer zero. However, at all but the lower frenquecies, SPL as inferred from the clinical audiogram agreed very well with SPL as measured by sound probe. It seems clear that the audiometer zero does not represent what the normal young ear can do when handicapped by the relative coarseness of clinical practice, as often alleged, but that the original data, on which the audiometer zero is based, contains an appreciable admixture of partial deafness.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several dozen young healthy men, aged 17–25 with negative auditory history, were used to determine SPL under a PDR-8 earphone at threshold for each of 8 frequencies. Careful psychophysical techniques were used, and a calibrated sound probe was used to measure SPL. In addition, an audiogram was taken by a common clinical technique. Average SPL of our population differs only a very few db from previous sound probe studies, being 12–20 db fainter than audiometer zero. However, at all but the lower frenquecies, SPL as inferred from the clinical audiogram agreed very well with SPL as measured by sound probe. It seems clear that the audiometer zero does not represent what the normal young ear can do when handicapped by the relative coarseness of clinical practice, as often alleged, but that the original data, on which the audiometer zero is based, contains an appreciable admixture of partial deafness.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several dozen young healthy men, aged 17–25 with negative auditory history, were used to determine SPL under a PDR-8 earphone at threshold for each of 8 frequencies. Careful psychophysical techniques were used, and a calibrated sound probe was used to measure SPL. In addition, an audiogram was taken by a common clinical technique. Average SPL of our population differs only a very few db from previous sound probe studies, being 12–20 db fainter than audiometer zero. However, at all but the lower frenquecies, SPL as inferred from the clinical audiogram agreed very well with SPL as measured by sound probe. It seems clear that the audiometer zero does not represent what the normal young ear can do when handicapped by the relative coarseness of clinical practice, as often alleged, but that the original data, on which the audiometer zero is based, contains an appreciable admixture of partial deafness.

Key concepts: Audiometer, Audiogram, Audiology, Acoustics, Zero (linguistics), Audiometry, Population, Hearing loss

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Specification of Zero Hearing Loss — Research Paper | ScholarLens