1976Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresRequires access

Paleomagnetism of the Wilberns Formation (Texas) and the Late Cambrian paleomagnetic field for North America

Rob Van der Voo, R. B. French, D. W. Williams

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

The natural remanent magnetizations of Late Cambrian siltstones of the Wilberns Formation have been analyzed with alternating field, thermal, and chemical demagnetization techniques. From mainly thermal demagnetization analyses a mean direction of magnetization has been calculated: declination D of 101.5°, inclination I of +13.5°, k = 171, and α95 = 4.6° for seven sites (55 samples), yielding a virtual pole position at 6.4°N, 158.8°E, dp = 2.4°, and dm = 4.7°. This polar error (dp, dm) represents the oval of 95% confidence about the pole position. Comparisons with previously published Late Cambrian data reveal good agreement between the thermally isolated directions of magnetization. The difference in the published results obtained through alternating field demagnetization can be explained by a late Paleozoic remagnetization or by a previously unexpected Cambrian shift or loop of the apparent polar wander path.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The natural remanent magnetizations of Late Cambrian siltstones of the Wilberns Formation have been analyzed with alternating field, thermal, and chemical demagnetization techniques. From mainly thermal demagnetization analyses a mean direction of magnetization has been calculated: declination D of 101.5°, inclination I of +13.5°, k = 171, and α95 = 4.6° for seven sites (55 samples), yielding a virtual pole position at 6.4°N, 158.8°E, dp = 2.4°, and dm = 4.7°. This polar error (dp, dm) represents the oval of 95% confidence about the pole position. Comparisons with previously published Late Cambrian data reveal good agreement between the thermally isolated directions of magnetization. The difference in the published results obtained through alternating field demagnetization can be explained by a late Paleozoic remagnetization or by a previously unexpected Cambrian shift or loop of the apparent polar wander path.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The natural remanent magnetizations of Late Cambrian siltstones of the Wilberns Formation have been analyzed with alternating field, thermal, and chemical demagnetization techniques. From mainly thermal demagnetization analyses a mean direction of magnetization has been calculated: declination D of 101.5°, inclination I of +13.5°, k = 171, and α95 = 4.6° for seven sites (55 samples), yielding a virtual pole position at 6.4°N, 158.8°E, dp = 2.4°, and dm = 4.7°. This polar error (dp, dm) represents the oval of 95% confidence about the pole position. Comparisons with previously published Late Cambrian data reveal good agreement between the thermally isolated directions of magnetization. The difference in the published results obtained through alternating field demagnetization can be explained by a late Paleozoic remagnetization or by a previously unexpected Cambrian shift or loop of the apparent polar wander path.

Key concepts: Paleomagnetism, Apparent polar wander, Geology, Polar wander, Demagnetizing field, Paleozoic, Declination, Geomagnetic pole

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Paleomagnetism of the Wilberns Formation (Texas) and the Late Cambrian paleomagnetic field for North America — Research Paper | ScholarLens