Paleomagnetism of the Wilberns Formation (Texas) and the Late Cambrian paleomagnetic field for North America
Rob Van der Voo, R. B. French, D. W. Williams
Abstract
Rob Van der Voo, R. B. French, D. W. Williams
Abstract
The natural remanent magnetizations of Late Cambrian siltstones of the Wilberns Formation have been analyzed with alternating field, thermal, and chemical demagnetization techniques. From mainly thermal demagnetization analyses a mean direction of magnetization has been calculated: declination D of 101.5°, inclination I of +13.5°, k = 171, and α95 = 4.6° for seven sites (55 samples), yielding a virtual pole position at 6.4°N, 158.8°E, dp = 2.4°, and dm = 4.7°. This polar error (dp, dm) represents the oval of 95% confidence about the pole position. Comparisons with previously published Late Cambrian data reveal good agreement between the thermally isolated directions of magnetization. The difference in the published results obtained through alternating field demagnetization can be explained by a late Paleozoic remagnetization or by a previously unexpected Cambrian shift or loop of the apparent polar wander path.
OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The natural remanent magnetizations of Late Cambrian siltstones of the Wilberns Formation have been analyzed with alternating field, thermal, and chemical demagnetization techniques. From mainly thermal demagnetization analyses a mean direction of magnetization has been calculated: declination D of 101.5°, inclination I of +13.5°, k = 171, and α95 = 4.6° for seven sites (55 samples), yielding a virtual pole position at 6.4°N, 158.8°E, dp = 2.4°, and dm = 4.7°. This polar error (dp, dm) represents the oval of 95% confidence about the pole position. Comparisons with previously published Late Cambrian data reveal good agreement between the thermally isolated directions of magnetization. The difference in the published results obtained through alternating field demagnetization can be explained by a late Paleozoic remagnetization or by a previously unexpected Cambrian shift or loop of the apparent polar wander path.
Key concepts: Paleomagnetism, Apparent polar wander, Geology, Polar wander, Demagnetizing field, Paleozoic, Declination, Geomagnetic pole