Major elective gastrointestinal surgery: does fluid restriction improve outcome?
Avinash Gobindram, S. Gowrie‐Mohan
Abstract
Avinash Gobindram, S. Gowrie‐Mohan
Abstract
Controversy regarding fluid therapy for major surgery dates back to the 1950s and is largely based on two differing concepts: the first, that the metabolic and stress response to surgery causes water and sodium retention, and the second, that there is redistribution of fluid into a hypothetical ‘third space’ leading to a fall in intravascular volume. Aggressive perioperative fluid resuscitation is the standard of care provided by many anaesthetists, however, evidence seems to suggest that this is flawed. Unfortunately, the answer is not as simple as following a restrictive fluid regimen.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Controversy regarding fluid therapy for major surgery dates back to the 1950s and is largely based on two differing concepts: the first, that the metabolic and stress response to surgery causes water and sodium retention, and the second, that there is redistribution of fluid into a hypothetical ‘third space’ leading to a fall in intravascular volume. Aggressive perioperative fluid resuscitation is the standard of care provided by many anaesthetists, however, evidence seems to suggest that this is flawed. Unfortunately, the answer is not as simple as following a restrictive fluid regimen.
Key concepts: Medicine, Fluid restriction, Intravenous fluid, Resuscitation, Perioperative, Fluid replacement, Intensive care medicine, Intravascular volume status