2012Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and StructuresRequires access

Dynamic analysis of magneto‐electro‐elastic cylindrical shells by quasi‐static and fully dynamic electromagnetic theories

B. Biju, N. Ganesan, K. Shankar

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present harmonic response of magneto‐electro‐elastic cylinder by quasi‐static and fully dynamic electromagnetic theories. The quasi‐static assumption uses magnetic scalar potential whereas magnetic vector potential is employed in a fully dynamic model. Design/methodology/approach The electric field induced by time varying magnetic field is non‐conservative and can be described by electric scalar potential and magnetic vector potentials. Findings The magnitude of vector potential is dominant in axial and circumferential direction whereas the magnetic flux density is significant in radial direction. Magnetic scalar potential approach evaluates only the radial component of magnetic flux density and electric field intensity is reasonably the same as that of the magnetic vector potential approach. Originality/value Semi‐analytical finite element method is used in this paper and the vector potential is formulated in cylindrical coordinates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose This paper aims to present harmonic response of magneto‐electro‐elastic cylinder by quasi‐static and fully dynamic electromagnetic theories. The quasi‐static assumption uses magnetic scalar potential whereas magnetic vector potential is employed in a fully dynamic model. Design/methodology/approach The electric field induced by time varying magnetic field is non‐conservative and can be described by electric scalar potential and magnetic vector potentials. Findings The magnitude of vector potential is dominant in axial and circumferential direction whereas the magnetic flux density is significant in radial direction. Magnetic scalar potential approach evaluates only the radial component of magnetic flux density and electric field intensity is reasonably the same as that of the magnetic vector potential approach. Originality/value Semi‐analytical finite element method is used in this paper and the vector potential is formulated in cylindrical coordinates.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present harmonic response of magneto‐electro‐elastic cylinder by quasi‐static and fully dynamic electromagnetic theories. The quasi‐static assumption uses magnetic scalar potential whereas magnetic vector potential is employed in a fully dynamic model. Design/methodology/approach The electric field induced by time varying magnetic field is non‐conservative and can be described by electric scalar potential and magnetic vector potentials. Findings The magnitude of vector potential is dominant in axial and circumferential direction whereas the magnetic flux density is significant in radial direction. Magnetic scalar potential approach evaluates only the radial component of magnetic flux density and electric field intensity is reasonably the same as that of the magnetic vector potential approach. Originality/value Semi‐analytical finite element method is used in this paper and the vector potential is formulated in cylindrical coordinates.

Key concepts: Magnetic potential, Scalar potential, Vector potential, Physics, Magnetic field, Scalar (mathematics), Magnetostatics, Magnetic flux

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dynamic analysis of magneto‐electro‐elastic cylindrical shells by quasi‐static and fully dynamic electromagnetic theories — Research Paper | ScholarLens