Piezoelectricity and flexoelectricity in crystalline dielectrics
A. K. Tagantsev
Abstract
A. K. Tagantsev
Abstract
Piezoelectricity in pyroelectrics and the linear response of polarization to a strain gradient?lexoelectricity) are discussed in the framework of the unified approach. It was pointed out by Born and Huang and by Martin, that there was a difference between the piezoelectric response for the cases of a sound wave and of a uniform strain in a finite crystal, and that only the ``proper'' parts of piezoelectric constants coincided for these cases. It is shown in this paper that there is no such difference if an accurate definition of piezoelectricity is applied. The theory of flexoelectricity in solid crystalline dielectrics is developed. It is shown that the general properties of flexoelectric response strongly differ from those of piezoelectric response: (1) there is an appreciable surface contribution to the flexoelectric response and (2) the bulk flexoelectric responses for the case of a propagating sound wave and for that of a static uniform strain gradient are considerably different. It is proposed to use flexoelectric effect as a method of crystal surface investigation.
OpenAlex reports 730 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Piezoelectricity in pyroelectrics and the linear response of polarization to a strain gradient?lexoelectricity) are discussed in the framework of the unified approach. It was pointed out by Born and Huang and by Martin, that there was a difference between the piezoelectric response for the cases of a sound wave and of a uniform strain in a finite crystal, and that only the ``proper'' parts of piezoelectric constants coincided for these cases. It is shown in this paper that there is no such difference if an accurate definition of piezoelectricity is applied. The theory of flexoelectricity in solid crystalline dielectrics is developed. It is shown that the general properties of flexoelectric response strongly differ from those of piezoelectric response: (1) there is an appreciable surface contribution to the flexoelectric response and (2) the bulk flexoelectric responses for the case of a propagating sound wave and for that of a static uniform strain gradient are considerably different. It is proposed to use flexoelectric effect as a method of crystal surface investigation.
Key concepts: Flexoelectricity, Piezoelectricity, Materials science, Dielectric, Condensed matter physics, Polarization (electrochemistry), Piezoelectric coefficient, Crystal (programming language)