1998Kodai Mathematical JournalRequires access

The uniqueness of meromorphic functions with their derivatives

Qing Cai Zhang

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the problem of uniqueness of meromorphic functions that share one finite value with their derivatives and obtain some theorems which improve a result given by Rainer Bruck. Introduction and main resultsBy a meromorphic function we shall always mean a function that is meromorphic in the whole complex plane.It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the notations of the Nevanlinna theory such as Γ(r,/), ra(r,/), JV(r,/), N(r,f), S(r,f) and so on, that can be found, for instance, in [1].And Ni)(r, I//) denotes the counting function of the simple zeros of/, Npfr, I//) = N(r, I//) -Λ/Ί)(r, I//).Let / and g be meromorphic functions and a be a complex constant, we say that / and g share the value a IM (ignoring multiplicity), if /a and g -a have the same zeros, they share the value a CM (counting multiplicity), if /a and g -a have the same zeros with the same multiplicity.In 1979, E. Mues and N. Steinmetz proved the following theorem in [2].THEOREM A. Let f be an entire function which is not constant.Iff and f share two distinct values a, b, then f = f.In 1996, Rainer Briick proved the following in [3] THEOREM B. Let f be an entire function which is not constant.If f and f share the value 1 CM, and if N(r, I// 7 ) = S(r,/), then £Ξί « for some non-zero constant c.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper, we deal with the problem of uniqueness of meromorphic functions that share one finite value with their derivatives and obtain some theorems which improve a result given by Rainer Bruck. Introduction and main resultsBy a meromorphic function we shall always mean a function that is meromorphic in the whole complex plane.It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the notations of the Nevanlinna theory such as Γ(r,/), ra(r,/), JV(r,/), N(r,f), S(r,f) and so on, that can be found, for instance, in [1].And Ni)(r, I//) denotes the counting function of the simple zeros of/, Npfr, I//) = N(r, I//) -Λ/Ί)(r, I//).Let / and g be meromorphic functions and a be a complex constant, we say that / and g share the value a IM (ignoring multiplicity), if /a and g -a have the same zeros, they share the value a CM (counting multiplicity), if /a and g -a have the same zeros with the same multiplicity.In 1979, E. Mues and N. Steinmetz proved the following theorem in [2].THEOREM A. Let f be an entire function which is not constant.Iff and f share two distinct values a, b, then f = f.In 1996, Rainer Briick proved the following in [3] THEOREM B. Let f be an entire function which is not constant.If f and f share the value 1 CM, and if N(r, I// 7 ) = S(r,/), then £Ξί « for some non-zero constant c.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper, we deal with the problem of uniqueness of meromorphic functions that share one finite value with their derivatives and obtain some theorems which improve a result given by Rainer Bruck. Introduction and main resultsBy a meromorphic function we shall always mean a function that is meromorphic in the whole complex plane.It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the notations of the Nevanlinna theory such as Γ(r,/), ra(r,/), JV(r,/), N(r,f), S(r,f) and so on, that can be found, for instance, in [1].And Ni)(r, I//) denotes the counting function of the simple zeros of/, Npfr, I//) = N(r, I//) -Λ/Ί)(r, I//).Let / and g be meromorphic functions and a be a complex constant, we say that / and g share the value a IM (ignoring multiplicity), if /a and g -a have the same zeros, they share the value a CM (counting multiplicity), if /a and g -a have the same zeros with the same multiplicity.In 1979, E. Mues and N. Steinmetz proved the following theorem in [2].THEOREM A. Let f be an entire function which is not constant.Iff and f share two distinct values a, b, then f = f.In 1996, Rainer Briick proved the following in [3] THEOREM B. Let f be an entire function which is not constant.If f and f share the value 1 CM, and if N(r, I// 7 ) = S(r,/), then £Ξί « for some non-zero constant c.

Key concepts: Meromorphic function, Uniqueness, Mathematics, Pure mathematics, Algebra over a field, Mathematical analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The uniqueness of meromorphic functions with their derivatives — Research Paper | ScholarLens