2004Cell CycleOpen access

Distinct Dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin During Mitosis

Marlène Delacour‐Larose, Annie Molla, Dimitrios A. Skoufias, Robert L. Margolis, Stéfan Dimitrov

Open full text 43 citations

Abstract

We have studied the dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin during mitosis in living cells, using C-terminal GFP chimeras of the two proteins. These chimeras showed identical localization and behave as bona fide wild type proteins. The mobility of Aurora B-GFP and Survivin-GFP was analyzed by FRAP. The data show that Survivin-GFP, in contrast to Aurora B-GFP, is highly mobile at prometaphase and metaphase. At telophase and cell cleavage, both chimeras are found to be fully immobile. The ablation of Aurora B by siRNA results in a dramatic decrease of the Survivin-GFP mobility. These results demonstrate that Survivin, but not Aurora B, is weakly associated with the centromeric chromatin at prometaphase and metaphase. The weak association of Survivin with centromeric chromatin is dependent on the presence of Aurora B and is not affected by treatment with either nocodazole or taxol. The rapid and conditional interchange between passenger proteins that we show by live imaging indicates that the high affinity interactions demonstrated with in vitro analysis of passenger protein binding are, in fact, static "snapshots" of highly dynamic and regulated in vivo interactions in mitotic cells.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have studied the dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin during mitosis in living cells, using C-terminal GFP chimeras of the two proteins. These chimeras showed identical localization and behave as bona fide wild type proteins. The mobility of Aurora B-GFP and Survivin-GFP was analyzed by FRAP. The data show that Survivin-GFP, in contrast to Aurora B-GFP, is highly mobile at prometaphase and metaphase. At telophase and cell cleavage, both chimeras are found to be fully immobile. The ablation of Aurora B by siRNA results in a dramatic decrease of the Survivin-GFP mobility. These results demonstrate that Survivin, but not Aurora B, is weakly associated with the centromeric chromatin at prometaphase and metaphase. The weak association of Survivin with centromeric chromatin is dependent on the presence of Aurora B and is not affected by treatment with either nocodazole or taxol. The rapid and conditional interchange between passenger proteins that we show by live imaging indicates that the high affinity interactions demonstrated with in vitro analysis of passenger protein binding are, in fact, static "snapshots" of highly dynamic and regulated in vivo interactions in mitotic cells.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have studied the dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin during mitosis in living cells, using C-terminal GFP chimeras of the two proteins. These chimeras showed identical localization and behave as bona fide wild type proteins. The mobility of Aurora B-GFP and Survivin-GFP was analyzed by FRAP. The data show that Survivin-GFP, in contrast to Aurora B-GFP, is highly mobile at prometaphase and metaphase. At telophase and cell cleavage, both chimeras are found to be fully immobile. The ablation of Aurora B by siRNA results in a dramatic decrease of the Survivin-GFP mobility. These results demonstrate that Survivin, but not Aurora B, is weakly associated with the centromeric chromatin at prometaphase and metaphase. The weak association of Survivin with centromeric chromatin is dependent on the presence of Aurora B and is not affected by treatment with either nocodazole or taxol. The rapid and conditional interchange between passenger proteins that we show by live imaging indicates that the high affinity interactions demonstrated with in vitro analysis of passenger protein binding are, in fact, static "snapshots" of highly dynamic and regulated in vivo interactions in mitotic cells.

Key concepts: Survivin, Prometaphase, Aurora B kinase, Biology, Nocodazole, Mitosis, Metaphase, Cell biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Distinct Dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin During Mitosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens