2010New WritingRequires access

Some Remarks about Semi-Automatic Writing: Between Constraints and Possibilities in a Writing Workshop

Milly Epstein‐Jannai

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This article illuminates a number of issues related to semi-automatic writing, and it is based on my long experience conducting writing workshops. Despite its complexities, this activity is generally thought to be spontaneous, primary and unplanned. In this article, semi-automatic writing emerges as a form of intensive writing practice that could stimulate discussion of both theoretical and practical issues related to textual communication. One of the results of this writing experience is that it leads to the de-automatisation of accepted reading and writing habits. Instead of totally freeing the written expression from cultural bonds (as it could be supposed to do), it presents it for examination, thus allowing discussion of what we take for granted regarding text and its shaping. The writing workshop encounter is presented here as a case study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article illuminates a number of issues related to semi-automatic writing, and it is based on my long experience conducting writing workshops. Despite its complexities, this activity is generally thought to be spontaneous, primary and unplanned. In this article, semi-automatic writing emerges as a form of intensive writing practice that could stimulate discussion of both theoretical and practical issues related to textual communication. One of the results of this writing experience is that it leads to the de-automatisation of accepted reading and writing habits. Instead of totally freeing the written expression from cultural bonds (as it could be supposed to do), it presents it for examination, thus allowing discussion of what we take for granted regarding text and its shaping. The writing workshop encounter is presented here as a case study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article illuminates a number of issues related to semi-automatic writing, and it is based on my long experience conducting writing workshops. Despite its complexities, this activity is generally thought to be spontaneous, primary and unplanned. In this article, semi-automatic writing emerges as a form of intensive writing practice that could stimulate discussion of both theoretical and practical issues related to textual communication. One of the results of this writing experience is that it leads to the de-automatisation of accepted reading and writing habits. Instead of totally freeing the written expression from cultural bonds (as it could be supposed to do), it presents it for examination, thus allowing discussion of what we take for granted regarding text and its shaping. The writing workshop encounter is presented here as a case study.

Key concepts: Reading (process), Professional writing, Expression (computer science), Writing system, Computer science, Linguistics, Psychology, Mathematics education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some Remarks about Semi-Automatic Writing: Between Constraints and Possibilities in a Writing Workshop — Research Paper | ScholarLens