2013•ZootaxaRequires access

Tropical insect collections and DNA extraction, using Rhodnius Stål 1859 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae)

Carolina Dale, Silvia A. Justi, Cléber Galvão

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Biological collections are central databases for information concerning morphology and diversity in all living groups (Marinoni et al. 2005). According to Blaxter (2004), valuable information about taxonomic identification and phylogenetic inference can be provided by DNA sequences. Common methods for DNA extraction normally involve partial destruction of the specimen; this kind of extraction is not attractive for use in the case of historical specimens. The application of that idea in insect collections became possible once Gilbert et al. (2007) published a new protocol that allows the extraction of this useful DNA from dry-preserved collection specimens for genetic analyses. However, the authors used specimens from four different collections located only in temperate zones (California Academy of Sciences, Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, and the National Science Museum, Tokyo).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Biological collections are central databases for information concerning morphology and diversity in all living groups (Marinoni et al. 2005). According to Blaxter (2004), valuable information about taxonomic identification and phylogenetic inference can be provided by DNA sequences. Common methods for DNA extraction normally involve partial destruction of the specimen; this kind of extraction is not attractive for use in the case of historical specimens. The application of that idea in insect collections became possible once Gilbert et al. (2007) published a new protocol that allows the extraction of this useful DNA from dry-preserved collection specimens for genetic analyses. However, the authors used specimens from four different collections located only in temperate zones (California Academy of Sciences, Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, and the National Science Museum, Tokyo).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Biological collections are central databases for information concerning morphology and diversity in all living groups (Marinoni et al. 2005). According to Blaxter (2004), valuable information about taxonomic identification and phylogenetic inference can be provided by DNA sequences. Common methods for DNA extraction normally involve partial destruction of the specimen; this kind of extraction is not attractive for use in the case of historical specimens. The application of that idea in insect collections became possible once Gilbert et al. (2007) published a new protocol that allows the extraction of this useful DNA from dry-preserved collection specimens for genetic analyses. However, the authors used specimens from four different collections located only in temperate zones (California Academy of Sciences, Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, and the National Science Museum, Tokyo).

Key concepts: Biology, Reduviidae, Triatominae, Hemiptera, DNA extraction, National Museum of Natural History, Phylogenetic tree, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tropical insect collections and DNA extraction, using Rhodnius Stål 1859 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) — Research Paper | ScholarLens