1987•Middle Eastern StudiesRequires access

The collapse of the Lebanese state

Nurit Kliot

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

In the 1980s, Lebanon cannot be considered to be a sovereign independent state, and its government controls neither most of the territory of the state nor its people. Lebanon, which was established as an independent state in 1946, is a jigsaw of religious-ethnic communities which share a long history of continuous conflict. There are several Christian communities in Lebanon: the Maronites consider themselves to be the founders of the Lebanese state and have clashed in the past with the Druze community and, during the 1975-76 civil war, with most of the Muslim communities; the Lebanese Greek Catholics and Armenians have usually supported the Maronite position, but the Greek Orthodox, who are concentrated in Northern Lebanon, hold pro-Syrian and pan-Arabist views, which have isolated them from the rest of the Christians. The Muslims are divided into Shiite, Sunni and Druze. Since the Civil War, the Shiites have been fighting against the Christians and also had a struggle against Sunni establishment concerning political representation of their sect. The Sunni masses were radicalized by the Palestinians in the 1970s and took up a position against Maronite political supremacy in Lebanon. The Druze, led by Jumblatt, took the leading position in the Leftist-Muslim camp during the 1975-76 Civil War. In addition to the internal sectarian conflicts, there have always been external powers which have helped to disintegrate the Lebanese state. The Great Powers France, Great Britain and the United States have always been interested and involved in Lebanese affairs as have Lebanon's Arab neighbors, especially Syria, which has taken an active interest and often intervened in Lebanese affairs. In the last decade Israel has also become deeply involved in Lebanon. The purpose of this article is to show that the collapse of the Lebanese state is based on the fact that Lebanon has been, to coin a word, a malintegrated state from its very beginning, and has failed in the development of a viable state-idea and the establishment of common socio-cultural values. Moreover, a confessional schism was built into the Lebanese polity, therefore increasing the rate of the disintegration of the state. The economic cleavages within the Lebanese society reinforced schisms in other spheres until, finally, the Lebanese state collapsed. These issues are discussed under four headings: Lebanon as a community of sentiment; Lebanon as a socio-cultural community; Lebanon as a political community and Lebanon as an economic community.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the 1980s, Lebanon cannot be considered to be a sovereign independent state, and its government controls neither most of the territory of the state nor its people. Lebanon, which was established as an independent state in 1946, is a jigsaw of religious-ethnic communities which share a long history of continuous conflict. There are several Christian communities in Lebanon: the Maronites consider themselves to be the founders of the Lebanese state and have clashed in the past with the Druze community and, during the 1975-76 civil war, with most of the Muslim communities; the Lebanese Greek Catholics and Armenians have usually supported the Maronite position, but the Greek Orthodox, who are concentrated in Northern Lebanon, hold pro-Syrian and pan-Arabist views, which have isolated them from the rest of the Christians. The Muslims are divided into Shiite, Sunni and Druze. Since the Civil War, the Shiites have been fighting against the Christians and also had a struggle against Sunni establishment concerning political representation of their sect. The Sunni masses were radicalized by the Palestinians in the 1970s and took up a position against Maronite political supremacy in Lebanon. The Druze, led by Jumblatt, took the leading position in the Leftist-Muslim camp during the 1975-76 Civil War. In addition to the internal sectarian conflicts, there have always been external powers which have helped to disintegrate the Lebanese state. The Great Powers France, Great Britain and the United States have always been interested and involved in Lebanese affairs as have Lebanon's Arab neighbors, especially Syria, which has taken an active interest and often intervened in Lebanese affairs. In the last decade Israel has also become deeply involved in Lebanon. The purpose of this article is to show that the collapse of the Lebanese state is based on the fact that Lebanon has been, to coin a word, a malintegrated state from its very beginning, and has failed in the development of a viable state-idea and the establishment of common socio-cultural values. Moreover, a confessional schism was built into the Lebanese polity, therefore increasing the rate of the disintegration of the state. The economic cleavages within the Lebanese society reinforced schisms in other spheres until, finally, the Lebanese state collapsed. These issues are discussed under four headings: Lebanon as a community of sentiment; Lebanon as a socio-cultural community; Lebanon as a political community and Lebanon as an economic community.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the 1980s, Lebanon cannot be considered to be a sovereign independent state, and its government controls neither most of the territory of the state nor its people. Lebanon, which was established as an independent state in 1946, is a jigsaw of religious-ethnic communities which share a long history of continuous conflict. There are several Christian communities in Lebanon: the Maronites consider themselves to be the founders of the Lebanese state and have clashed in the past with the Druze community and, during the 1975-76 civil war, with most of the Muslim communities; the Lebanese Greek Catholics and Armenians have usually supported the Maronite position, but the Greek Orthodox, who are concentrated in Northern Lebanon, hold pro-Syrian and pan-Arabist views, which have isolated them from the rest of the Christians. The Muslims are divided into Shiite, Sunni and Druze. Since the Civil War, the Shiites have been fighting against the Christians and also had a struggle against Sunni establishment concerning political representation of their sect. The Sunni masses were radicalized by the Palestinians in the 1970s and took up a position against Maronite political supremacy in Lebanon. The Druze, led by Jumblatt, took the leading position in the Leftist-Muslim camp during the 1975-76 Civil War. In addition to the internal sectarian conflicts, there have always been external powers which have helped to disintegrate the Lebanese state. The Great Powers France, Great Britain and the United States have always been interested and involved in Lebanese affairs as have Lebanon's Arab neighbors, especially Syria, which has taken an active interest and often intervened in Lebanese affairs. In the last decade Israel has also become deeply involved in Lebanon. The purpose of this article is to show that the collapse of the Lebanese state is based on the fact that Lebanon has been, to coin a word, a malintegrated state from its very beginning, and has failed in the development of a viable state-idea and the establishment of common socio-cultural values. Moreover, a confessional schism was built into the Lebanese polity, therefore increasing the rate of the disintegration of the state. The economic cleavages within the Lebanese society reinforced schisms in other spheres until, finally, the Lebanese state collapsed. These issues are discussed under four headings: Lebanon as a community of sentiment; Lebanon as a socio-cultural community; Lebanon as a political community and Lebanon as an economic community.

Key concepts: State (computer science), Political science, Ancient history, Law, Political economy, History, Sociology, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The collapse of the Lebanese state — Research Paper | ScholarLens