1998Klinische Monatsblätter für AugenheilkundeRequires access

Toxoplasmose-Retinochorioiditis, ein Therapievergleich zwischen Spiramycin und Pyrimethamin/Sulfadiazin

M.R. Hacker, Roland Richter, H Gümbel, Traute Richter, Christian Ohrloff

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis with spiramycin is an alternative to sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine. The treatment with sulfadiazine is associated with multiple side effects. Sulfadiazine is contraindicated during pregnancy and breastfeeding period. Spiramycin has less side effects and is recommended during pregnancy and breastfeeding period. The efficacy of spiramycin in treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis is still a matter of controversy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, side effects and outcome of therapy in 44 patients with toxoplasma retinochoroiditis treated with sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine (n = 30) or spiramycin (n = 14) were compared. We assessed duration of therapy and healing, ophthalmoscopic findings and observed side effects. RESULTS: The mean healing time in the group of spiramycin was 63.83 days in comparison to 88 days for the group of patients treated with sulfadiazine/pyrimethamine. The frequency of side effects was lower in the group treated with spiramycin. CONCLUSION: In comparison to a combined application of sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine the treatment with spiramycin alone requires a shorter duration of therapy and healing period. Additionally, side effects and contraindications appear to be less frequent. In view of these findings, spiramycin therapy must be considered as a promising approach in the treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis with spiramycin is an alternative to sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine. The treatment with sulfadiazine is associated with multiple side effects. Sulfadiazine is contraindicated during pregnancy and breastfeeding period. Spiramycin has less side effects and is recommended during pregnancy and breastfeeding period. The efficacy of spiramycin in treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis is still a matter of controversy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, side effects and outcome of therapy in 44 patients with toxoplasma retinochoroiditis treated with sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine (n = 30) or spiramycin (n = 14) were compared. We assessed duration of therapy and healing, ophthalmoscopic findings and observed side effects. RESULTS: The mean healing time in the group of spiramycin was 63.83 days in comparison to 88 days for the group of patients treated with sulfadiazine/pyrimethamine. The frequency of side effects was lower in the group treated with spiramycin. CONCLUSION: In comparison to a combined application of sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine the treatment with spiramycin alone requires a shorter duration of therapy and healing period. Additionally, side effects and contraindications appear to be less frequent. In view of these findings, spiramycin therapy must be considered as a promising approach in the treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis with spiramycin is an alternative to sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine. The treatment with sulfadiazine is associated with multiple side effects. Sulfadiazine is contraindicated during pregnancy and breastfeeding period. Spiramycin has less side effects and is recommended during pregnancy and breastfeeding period. The efficacy of spiramycin in treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis is still a matter of controversy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, side effects and outcome of therapy in 44 patients with toxoplasma retinochoroiditis treated with sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine (n = 30) or spiramycin (n = 14) were compared. We assessed duration of therapy and healing, ophthalmoscopic findings and observed side effects. RESULTS: The mean healing time in the group of spiramycin was 63.83 days in comparison to 88 days for the group of patients treated with sulfadiazine/pyrimethamine. The frequency of side effects was lower in the group treated with spiramycin. CONCLUSION: In comparison to a combined application of sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine the treatment with spiramycin alone requires a shorter duration of therapy and healing period. Additionally, side effects and contraindications appear to be less frequent. In view of these findings, spiramycin therapy must be considered as a promising approach in the treatment of toxoplasma retinochoroiditis.

Key concepts: Spiramycin, Sulfadiazine, Pyrimethamine, Medicine, Toxoplasmosis, Breastfeeding, Side effect (computer science), Chorioretinitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Toxoplasmose-Retinochorioiditis, ein Therapievergleich zwischen Spiramycin und Pyrimethamin/Sulfadiazin — Research Paper | ScholarLens