1991Proceedings of the American Power Conference; (United States)Requires access

Flexibility for CGCC power generation; LPM energy storage

Earl R. Osterstock, J. Klosek

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Energy storage systems have long been used to increase the utilization of capital-intensive power generating assets. Conventional energy storage technologies - such as pumped hydroelectric, compressed air, and batteries - take excess electric power from baseload generating units, store it, and deliver power during peak demand periods. While these technologies share a common objective, they each have their own characteristics and in fact are rather different one from another. The choice of energy storage technology is obviously dependent on many factors, including size, system characteristics, lead time, topographic and environmental considerations - and of course, efficiency and cost. This paper describes a technology which provides energy storage to complement a Coal Gasification Combined-Cycle electric power facility. The concept is called the Liquid Phase Methanol (LPM) process which co-produces methanol along with electric power. Because of the synergy of the LPM process with the CGCC process there are unusual efficiency, cost and flexibility benefits realized with this type of energy storage as compared to conventional systems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Energy storage systems have long been used to increase the utilization of capital-intensive power generating assets. Conventional energy storage technologies - such as pumped hydroelectric, compressed air, and batteries - take excess electric power from baseload generating units, store it, and deliver power during peak demand periods. While these technologies share a common objective, they each have their own characteristics and in fact are rather different one from another. The choice of energy storage technology is obviously dependent on many factors, including size, system characteristics, lead time, topographic and environmental considerations - and of course, efficiency and cost. This paper describes a technology which provides energy storage to complement a Coal Gasification Combined-Cycle electric power facility. The concept is called the Liquid Phase Methanol (LPM) process which co-produces methanol along with electric power. Because of the synergy of the LPM process with the CGCC process there are unusual efficiency, cost and flexibility benefits realized with this type of energy storage as compared to conventional systems.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Energy storage systems have long been used to increase the utilization of capital-intensive power generating assets. Conventional energy storage technologies - such as pumped hydroelectric, compressed air, and batteries - take excess electric power from baseload generating units, store it, and deliver power during peak demand periods. While these technologies share a common objective, they each have their own characteristics and in fact are rather different one from another. The choice of energy storage technology is obviously dependent on many factors, including size, system characteristics, lead time, topographic and environmental considerations - and of course, efficiency and cost. This paper describes a technology which provides energy storage to complement a Coal Gasification Combined-Cycle electric power facility. The concept is called the Liquid Phase Methanol (LPM) process which co-produces methanol along with electric power. Because of the synergy of the LPM process with the CGCC process there are unusual efficiency, cost and flexibility benefits realized with this type of energy storage as compared to conventional systems.

Key concepts: Pumped-storage hydroelectricity, Energy storage, Flexibility (engineering), Process engineering, Electric power, Capital cost, Electricity generation, Compressed air energy storage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Flexibility for CGCC power generation; LPM energy storage — Research Paper | ScholarLens