2006The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchRequires access

Effect of Plyometric Training on Running Performance and Vertical Jumping in Prepubertal Boys

Christos M. Kotzamanidis

Open publisher page 192 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of plyometric training on running velocity (RV) and squat jump (SJ) in prepubescent boys. Fifteen boys (11.1 +/- 0.5 years) followed a 10-week plyometric program (JUMP group). Another group of 15 boys (10.9 +/- 0.7 years) followed only the physical education program in primary school and was used as the control group (CONT group). Running distances (0-10 m, 10-20 m, 20-30 m, and 0-30 m), were selected as testing variables to evaluate the training program. The total number of jumps was initially 60 per session, which was gradually increased over a period of 10 weeks to 100 per session. Results revealed significant differences between CONT and JUMP groups in RV and SJ. In JUMP group the velocity for the running distances 0-30, 10-20, and 20-30 m increased (p < 0.05), but not for the distance 0-10 m (p > 0.05). Additionally, the SJ performance of the JUMP group increased significantly, as well (p < 0.05). There was no change in either RV or SJ for the CONT group. These results indicate that plyometric exercises can improve SJ and RV in prepubertal boys. More specifically, this program selectively influenced the maximum velocity phase, but not the acceleration phase.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of plyometric training on running velocity (RV) and squat jump (SJ) in prepubescent boys. Fifteen boys (11.1 +/- 0.5 years) followed a 10-week plyometric program (JUMP group). Another group of 15 boys (10.9 +/- 0.7 years) followed only the physical education program in primary school and was used as the control group (CONT group). Running distances (0-10 m, 10-20 m, 20-30 m, and 0-30 m), were selected as testing variables to evaluate the training program. The total number of jumps was initially 60 per session, which was gradually increased over a period of 10 weeks to 100 per session. Results revealed significant differences between CONT and JUMP groups in RV and SJ. In JUMP group the velocity for the running distances 0-30, 10-20, and 20-30 m increased (p < 0.05), but not for the distance 0-10 m (p > 0.05). Additionally, the SJ performance of the JUMP group increased significantly, as well (p < 0.05). There was no change in either RV or SJ for the CONT group. These results indicate that plyometric exercises can improve SJ and RV in prepubertal boys. More specifically, this program selectively influenced the maximum velocity phase, but not the acceleration phase.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 192 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of plyometric training on running velocity (RV) and squat jump (SJ) in prepubescent boys. Fifteen boys (11.1 +/- 0.5 years) followed a 10-week plyometric program (JUMP group). Another group of 15 boys (10.9 +/- 0.7 years) followed only the physical education program in primary school and was used as the control group (CONT group). Running distances (0-10 m, 10-20 m, 20-30 m, and 0-30 m), were selected as testing variables to evaluate the training program. The total number of jumps was initially 60 per session, which was gradually increased over a period of 10 weeks to 100 per session. Results revealed significant differences between CONT and JUMP groups in RV and SJ. In JUMP group the velocity for the running distances 0-30, 10-20, and 20-30 m increased (p < 0.05), but not for the distance 0-10 m (p > 0.05). Additionally, the SJ performance of the JUMP group increased significantly, as well (p < 0.05). There was no change in either RV or SJ for the CONT group. These results indicate that plyometric exercises can improve SJ and RV in prepubertal boys. More specifically, this program selectively influenced the maximum velocity phase, but not the acceleration phase.

Key concepts: Plyometrics, Jump, Jumping, Mathematics, Physical therapy, Stretch shortening cycle, Acceleration, Vertical jump

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Plyometric Training on Running Performance and Vertical Jumping in Prepubertal Boys — Research Paper | ScholarLens