1999•NeuroreportRequires access

Are face-responsive regions selective only for faces?

Linda L. Chao, Alex D. Martin, James V. Haxby

Open publisher page 169 citations

Abstract

To examine the specificity of face-responsive regions for face processing, we used fMRI to measure the response of the fusiform gyrus and the superior temporal sulcus (STS) to pictures of human faces, animals, faceless animals, and houses. Results indicate that faces, animals, and faceless animals all elicited greater activity than houses, and had identical peaks of activation in the lateral fusiform gyrus, bilaterally, and in the right posterior STS. Moreover, within the lateral fusiform gyrus the responses to faces, animals and faceless animals were all greater than the responses to these stimuli in the medial aspect of the fusiform gyrus, a region that responds more strongly to other objects (e.g. houses). These findings suggest that the neural representation of animals in the fusiform gyrus and the posterior STS relies strongly on the same neural substrates that represent faces.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To examine the specificity of face-responsive regions for face processing, we used fMRI to measure the response of the fusiform gyrus and the superior temporal sulcus (STS) to pictures of human faces, animals, faceless animals, and houses. Results indicate that faces, animals, and faceless animals all elicited greater activity than houses, and had identical peaks of activation in the lateral fusiform gyrus, bilaterally, and in the right posterior STS. Moreover, within the lateral fusiform gyrus the responses to faces, animals and faceless animals were all greater than the responses to these stimuli in the medial aspect of the fusiform gyrus, a region that responds more strongly to other objects (e.g. houses). These findings suggest that the neural representation of animals in the fusiform gyrus and the posterior STS relies strongly on the same neural substrates that represent faces.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 169 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To examine the specificity of face-responsive regions for face processing, we used fMRI to measure the response of the fusiform gyrus and the superior temporal sulcus (STS) to pictures of human faces, animals, faceless animals, and houses. Results indicate that faces, animals, and faceless animals all elicited greater activity than houses, and had identical peaks of activation in the lateral fusiform gyrus, bilaterally, and in the right posterior STS. Moreover, within the lateral fusiform gyrus the responses to faces, animals and faceless animals were all greater than the responses to these stimuli in the medial aspect of the fusiform gyrus, a region that responds more strongly to other objects (e.g. houses). These findings suggest that the neural representation of animals in the fusiform gyrus and the posterior STS relies strongly on the same neural substrates that represent faces.

Key concepts: Fusiform gyrus, Fusiform face area, Neuroscience, Face perception, Limbic lobe, Superior temporal sulcus, Gyrus, Inferior temporal gyrus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Are face-responsive regions selective only for faces? — Research Paper | ScholarLens