1997International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector MarketingOpen access

Moneyless exchange: Attitudes of participants in Australian community barter systems

Dawn Birch, Peter W. Liesch

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Community‐based barter systems, known as LETS, appear to have become in‐stitutionalised, that is accepted as an alternative exchange system across Australia and in other Western countries. LETS are non‐profit enterprises, which allow members of a community to exchange goods and services without cash. A search of the literature reveals that very little empirical investigation has been conducted on these systems. Hence, the purpose of this study is to provide insight on the motivations for the establishment of these systems and to contribute to the literature on community‐based barter. This paper reports the findings of a survey of 371 members of Australian LETS. The findings indicate that LETS are most attractive to the unemployed and those with low household incomes. LETS have been established to empower and build cohesive communities; the benefits of membership are both economic and psycho‐social, and include a better quality of life, increased freedom and opportunities for using skills. The disadvantages of membership in LETS include limited trading opportunities and some trading problems. While pricing varies across transactions, most members report that they generally buy and sell within the system at the equivalent of the cash price. The success of LETS is based on the establishment and maintenance of good trading relationships and these systems are expected to continue irrespective of the economic climate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Community‐based barter systems, known as LETS, appear to have become in‐stitutionalised, that is accepted as an alternative exchange system across Australia and in other Western countries. LETS are non‐profit enterprises, which allow members of a community to exchange goods and services without cash. A search of the literature reveals that very little empirical investigation has been conducted on these systems. Hence, the purpose of this study is to provide insight on the motivations for the establishment of these systems and to contribute to the literature on community‐based barter. This paper reports the findings of a survey of 371 members of Australian LETS. The findings indicate that LETS are most attractive to the unemployed and those with low household incomes. LETS have been established to empower and build cohesive communities; the benefits of membership are both economic and psycho‐social, and include a better quality of life, increased freedom and opportunities for using skills. The disadvantages of membership in LETS include limited trading opportunities and some trading problems. While pricing varies across transactions, most members report that they generally buy and sell within the system at the equivalent of the cash price. The success of LETS is based on the establishment and maintenance of good trading relationships and these systems are expected to continue irrespective of the economic climate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Community‐based barter systems, known as LETS, appear to have become in‐stitutionalised, that is accepted as an alternative exchange system across Australia and in other Western countries. LETS are non‐profit enterprises, which allow members of a community to exchange goods and services without cash. A search of the literature reveals that very little empirical investigation has been conducted on these systems. Hence, the purpose of this study is to provide insight on the motivations for the establishment of these systems and to contribute to the literature on community‐based barter. This paper reports the findings of a survey of 371 members of Australian LETS. The findings indicate that LETS are most attractive to the unemployed and those with low household incomes. LETS have been established to empower and build cohesive communities; the benefits of membership are both economic and psycho‐social, and include a better quality of life, increased freedom and opportunities for using skills. The disadvantages of membership in LETS include limited trading opportunities and some trading problems. While pricing varies across transactions, most members report that they generally buy and sell within the system at the equivalent of the cash price. The success of LETS is based on the establishment and maintenance of good trading relationships and these systems are expected to continue irrespective of the economic climate.

Key concepts: Barter, Cash, Profit (economics), Business, Goods and services, Quality (philosophy), Marketing, Public economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Moneyless exchange: Attitudes of participants in Australian community barter systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens