2000LangagesRequires access

Introduction. Classes grammaticales et créolisation : la syntaxe des langues créoles

Georges Daniel Véronique

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Daniel Veronique: Grammatical categories and creolization : creole language syntax Creoles and Pidgins, a source of controversy in linguistic theory, share some properties and, often, analogous sociohistorical circumstances, which, however, do not suffice to assert the existence of a distinct linguistic category. Theories of creole genesis vary in the importance they bestow upon pidginization, creolization, language contact and linguistic creativity. Universalist theories emphasize the role of the bioprogram or of Universal Grammar while other theories insist on the part played by the substratum, the lexifier language or the language acquisition process. The issue of grammatical categories is crucial to various theories of creole genesis, for instance those which favour the substratum or the lexifier. The present issue is devoted to grammatical categories in French Creoles through an analysis of pronouns and adjectives in these languages.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Daniel Veronique: Grammatical categories and creolization : creole language syntax Creoles and Pidgins, a source of controversy in linguistic theory, share some properties and, often, analogous sociohistorical circumstances, which, however, do not suffice to assert the existence of a distinct linguistic category. Theories of creole genesis vary in the importance they bestow upon pidginization, creolization, language contact and linguistic creativity. Universalist theories emphasize the role of the bioprogram or of Universal Grammar while other theories insist on the part played by the substratum, the lexifier language or the language acquisition process. The issue of grammatical categories is crucial to various theories of creole genesis, for instance those which favour the substratum or the lexifier. The present issue is devoted to grammatical categories in French Creoles through an analysis of pronouns and adjectives in these languages.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Daniel Veronique: Grammatical categories and creolization : creole language syntax Creoles and Pidgins, a source of controversy in linguistic theory, share some properties and, often, analogous sociohistorical circumstances, which, however, do not suffice to assert the existence of a distinct linguistic category. Theories of creole genesis vary in the importance they bestow upon pidginization, creolization, language contact and linguistic creativity. Universalist theories emphasize the role of the bioprogram or of Universal Grammar while other theories insist on the part played by the substratum, the lexifier language or the language acquisition process. The issue of grammatical categories is crucial to various theories of creole genesis, for instance those which favour the substratum or the lexifier. The present issue is devoted to grammatical categories in French Creoles through an analysis of pronouns and adjectives in these languages.

Key concepts: Creolization, Creole language, Linguistics, Grammar, Syntax, Linguistic description, Language contact, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Introduction. Classes grammaticales et créolisation : la syntaxe des langues créoles — Research Paper | ScholarLens