1961•Proceedings of the American Mathematical SocietyOpen access

Summability-preserving functions

Edward C. Posner

Open full text 36 citations

Abstract

PROOF. Every subsequence of { Xn} converges, so that every subsequence of {f(xn) } is A-summable, by hypothesis. By [I], applied to complex sequences, {f(xn) } is actually convergent. (For the proof of [I] can be modified to apply to complex sequences. Or, see [2, Theorem 2], for a proof in a slightly more general context.) Let I xn } converge to x. The sequence xi, x, x2, x, * * * is also convergent, so that the sequence f(x1), f(x), f(x2), f(x), * * * converges. This shows that {f(xn) } converges to f(x) whenever { xn } converges to x. Thus the continuity of f is proved. The converse of the lemma is a consequence of the definition of Toeplitz matrix. The lemma is of course also true for real-valued functions of a real variable. The same comment applies also after the following theorem.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PROOF. Every subsequence of { Xn} converges, so that every subsequence of {f(xn) } is A-summable, by hypothesis. By [I], applied to complex sequences, {f(xn) } is actually convergent. (For the proof of [I] can be modified to apply to complex sequences. Or, see [2, Theorem 2], for a proof in a slightly more general context.) Let I xn } converge to x. The sequence xi, x, x2, x, * * * is also convergent, so that the sequence f(x1), f(x), f(x2), f(x), * * * converges. This shows that {f(xn) } converges to f(x) whenever { xn } converges to x. Thus the continuity of f is proved. The converse of the lemma is a consequence of the definition of Toeplitz matrix. The lemma is of course also true for real-valued functions of a real variable. The same comment applies also after the following theorem.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PROOF. Every subsequence of { Xn} converges, so that every subsequence of {f(xn) } is A-summable, by hypothesis. By [I], applied to complex sequences, {f(xn) } is actually convergent. (For the proof of [I] can be modified to apply to complex sequences. Or, see [2, Theorem 2], for a proof in a slightly more general context.) Let I xn } converge to x. The sequence xi, x, x2, x, * * * is also convergent, so that the sequence f(x1), f(x), f(x2), f(x), * * * converges. This shows that {f(xn) } converges to f(x) whenever { xn } converges to x. Thus the continuity of f is proved. The converse of the lemma is a consequence of the definition of Toeplitz matrix. The lemma is of course also true for real-valued functions of a real variable. The same comment applies also after the following theorem.

Key concepts: Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Summability-preserving functions — Research Paper | ScholarLens