The student learning process: Learning styles or learning approaches?
Peter F. Cuthbert
Abstract
Peter F. Cuthbert
Abstract
The Learning Styles school and the Approaches to Learning school represent two rather different perspectives on the interaction of students with a learning situation. This paper outlines the basic positions of the two schools, and then considers the extent to which it is possible to reconcile them. A possible framework for such a task by Riding (1997 Riding, RJ. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17(1 & 2): 29–49. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) is discussed and areas of commonality are highlighted. Neither school is free from criticism, and a summary of the criticisms of the constructs and the data collection instruments is provided in each case. Finally, research into the impact of the two schools on student learning is considered. Overall it is concluded that investigation of students’ Learning Styles or Approaches to Learning are probably of more benefit to the teacher than to the individual student.
OpenAlex reports 150 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Learning Styles school and the Approaches to Learning school represent two rather different perspectives on the interaction of students with a learning situation. This paper outlines the basic positions of the two schools, and then considers the extent to which it is possible to reconcile them. A possible framework for such a task by Riding (1997 Riding, RJ. (1997). On the nature of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 17(1 & 2): 29–49. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) is discussed and areas of commonality are highlighted. Neither school is free from criticism, and a summary of the criticisms of the constructs and the data collection instruments is provided in each case. Finally, research into the impact of the two schools on student learning is considered. Overall it is concluded that investigation of students’ Learning Styles or Approaches to Learning are probably of more benefit to the teacher than to the individual student.
Key concepts: Experiential learning, Mathematics education, Psychology, Active learning (machine learning), Learning sciences, Process (computing), Learning styles, Cooperative learning