1967Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyRequires access

Deformation Mechanisms in Polycrystalline Graphite

O.D. Slagle

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

The microstructure of SGBF graphite was observed under tensile and compressive stresses. Increasing stress generated extensive cracking parallel to the layering direction in the particles. Such cracking, however, was not necessarily directly attributable to the low strength of the graphite crystallites in the c direction but rather to flaws or weak regions which tended to occur between the layer planes. For tensile stress, the cracks were perpendicular to the direction of the applied stress, whereas in compression, the cracking was parallel to the applied stress. Analysis of the stress‐strain relations for SGBF graphite in tension indicates a discrepancy with the previously proposed plastic deformation model. The discrepancy is attributed to the effect of the observed cracking on the internal stress distribution. An alternative explanation is proposed on the basis of internal stresses, localized cracking, and interlayer slip.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The microstructure of SGBF graphite was observed under tensile and compressive stresses. Increasing stress generated extensive cracking parallel to the layering direction in the particles. Such cracking, however, was not necessarily directly attributable to the low strength of the graphite crystallites in the c direction but rather to flaws or weak regions which tended to occur between the layer planes. For tensile stress, the cracks were perpendicular to the direction of the applied stress, whereas in compression, the cracking was parallel to the applied stress. Analysis of the stress‐strain relations for SGBF graphite in tension indicates a discrepancy with the previously proposed plastic deformation model. The discrepancy is attributed to the effect of the observed cracking on the internal stress distribution. An alternative explanation is proposed on the basis of internal stresses, localized cracking, and interlayer slip.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The microstructure of SGBF graphite was observed under tensile and compressive stresses. Increasing stress generated extensive cracking parallel to the layering direction in the particles. Such cracking, however, was not necessarily directly attributable to the low strength of the graphite crystallites in the c direction but rather to flaws or weak regions which tended to occur between the layer planes. For tensile stress, the cracks were perpendicular to the direction of the applied stress, whereas in compression, the cracking was parallel to the applied stress. Analysis of the stress‐strain relations for SGBF graphite in tension indicates a discrepancy with the previously proposed plastic deformation model. The discrepancy is attributed to the effect of the observed cracking on the internal stress distribution. An alternative explanation is proposed on the basis of internal stresses, localized cracking, and interlayer slip.

Key concepts: Materials science, Composite material, Cracking, Graphite, Ultimate tensile strength, Perpendicular, Slip (aerodynamics), Deformation (meteorology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Deformation Mechanisms in Polycrystalline Graphite — Research Paper | ScholarLens