Deformation Mechanisms in Polycrystalline Graphite
O.D. Slagle
Abstract
O.D. Slagle
Abstract
The microstructure of SGBF graphite was observed under tensile and compressive stresses. Increasing stress generated extensive cracking parallel to the layering direction in the particles. Such cracking, however, was not necessarily directly attributable to the low strength of the graphite crystallites in the c direction but rather to flaws or weak regions which tended to occur between the layer planes. For tensile stress, the cracks were perpendicular to the direction of the applied stress, whereas in compression, the cracking was parallel to the applied stress. Analysis of the stress‐strain relations for SGBF graphite in tension indicates a discrepancy with the previously proposed plastic deformation model. The discrepancy is attributed to the effect of the observed cracking on the internal stress distribution. An alternative explanation is proposed on the basis of internal stresses, localized cracking, and interlayer slip.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The microstructure of SGBF graphite was observed under tensile and compressive stresses. Increasing stress generated extensive cracking parallel to the layering direction in the particles. Such cracking, however, was not necessarily directly attributable to the low strength of the graphite crystallites in the c direction but rather to flaws or weak regions which tended to occur between the layer planes. For tensile stress, the cracks were perpendicular to the direction of the applied stress, whereas in compression, the cracking was parallel to the applied stress. Analysis of the stress‐strain relations for SGBF graphite in tension indicates a discrepancy with the previously proposed plastic deformation model. The discrepancy is attributed to the effect of the observed cracking on the internal stress distribution. An alternative explanation is proposed on the basis of internal stresses, localized cracking, and interlayer slip.
Key concepts: Materials science, Composite material, Cracking, Graphite, Ultimate tensile strength, Perpendicular, Slip (aerodynamics), Deformation (meteorology)