2006Home CulturesRequires access

Who's Afraid of Kitsch? The Impact of Taste Reforms in the Netherlands

Irene Cieraad, Sjoerdtje Porte

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This article evaluates the judgments of taste of a group of twenty-four interviewees in the light of past taste reforms, which battled the general public's taste for kitsch. It shows that males with less education have been most receptive to teachings on taste, resulting in their dislike of exuberant objects. Compared with the outcome of a research project fifty years ago, which registered a taste for the austere with young intellectuals only, there is a complete change of preferences; today's higher educated interviewees show a liking for some of the more peculiar specimens. In explaining these obvious changes in the judgments of taste, Bourdieu's theory of distinction is compared with Peterson and Kern's concept of omnivorousness in highbrow taste.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article evaluates the judgments of taste of a group of twenty-four interviewees in the light of past taste reforms, which battled the general public's taste for kitsch. It shows that males with less education have been most receptive to teachings on taste, resulting in their dislike of exuberant objects. Compared with the outcome of a research project fifty years ago, which registered a taste for the austere with young intellectuals only, there is a complete change of preferences; today's higher educated interviewees show a liking for some of the more peculiar specimens. In explaining these obvious changes in the judgments of taste, Bourdieu's theory of distinction is compared with Peterson and Kern's concept of omnivorousness in highbrow taste.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article evaluates the judgments of taste of a group of twenty-four interviewees in the light of past taste reforms, which battled the general public's taste for kitsch. It shows that males with less education have been most receptive to teachings on taste, resulting in their dislike of exuberant objects. Compared with the outcome of a research project fifty years ago, which registered a taste for the austere with young intellectuals only, there is a complete change of preferences; today's higher educated interviewees show a liking for some of the more peculiar specimens. In explaining these obvious changes in the judgments of taste, Bourdieu's theory of distinction is compared with Peterson and Kern's concept of omnivorousness in highbrow taste.

Key concepts: Highbrow, Taste, Kitsch, Aesthetics, Sociology, Psychology, Art, Literature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Who's Afraid of Kitsch? The Impact of Taste Reforms in the Netherlands — Research Paper | ScholarLens