2008•Environmental PoliticsRequires access

The ethics of climate politics: four modes of moral discourse

Menno R. Kamminga

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

This article argues that James Gustafson's ‘modes of moral discourse’ framework is highly valuable for conceptualising the ethics of climate politics, or ‘climate ethics’. The moral-philosophical task of developing principles of climate justice, or the issue of how the burdens (and benefits) of global climate change should be distributed between and within generations, is essential to climate ethics, but it is also insufficient. Climate ethics should avoid focusing too exclusively on ‘(technical-)ethical’ discourse, but also incorporate insights from ‘narrative’, ‘policy’, and ‘prophetic’ discourses about or relevant to climate change politics. Climate ethics is to be conceived as pluralist: broad and interdisciplinary, but presumably conflictual and tragic as well.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article argues that James Gustafson's ‘modes of moral discourse’ framework is highly valuable for conceptualising the ethics of climate politics, or ‘climate ethics’. The moral-philosophical task of developing principles of climate justice, or the issue of how the burdens (and benefits) of global climate change should be distributed between and within generations, is essential to climate ethics, but it is also insufficient. Climate ethics should avoid focusing too exclusively on ‘(technical-)ethical’ discourse, but also incorporate insights from ‘narrative’, ‘policy’, and ‘prophetic’ discourses about or relevant to climate change politics. Climate ethics is to be conceived as pluralist: broad and interdisciplinary, but presumably conflictual and tragic as well.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article argues that James Gustafson's ‘modes of moral discourse’ framework is highly valuable for conceptualising the ethics of climate politics, or ‘climate ethics’. The moral-philosophical task of developing principles of climate justice, or the issue of how the burdens (and benefits) of global climate change should be distributed between and within generations, is essential to climate ethics, but it is also insufficient. Climate ethics should avoid focusing too exclusively on ‘(technical-)ethical’ discourse, but also incorporate insights from ‘narrative’, ‘policy’, and ‘prophetic’ discourses about or relevant to climate change politics. Climate ethics is to be conceived as pluralist: broad and interdisciplinary, but presumably conflictual and tragic as well.

Key concepts: Politics, Environmental ethics, Climate justice, Climate change, Sociology, Economic Justice, Normative ethics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The ethics of climate politics: four modes of moral discourse — Research Paper | ScholarLens