1994The Leading EdgeRequires access

Seismic-guided estimation of log properties (Part 1: A data-driven interpretation methodology)

Philip S. Schultz, Shuki Ronen, Masami Hattori, Chip Corbett

Open publisher page 94 citations

Abstract

Seismic data are routinely and effectively used to estimate the structure of reservoir bodies but often play no role in the essential task of estimating the spatial distribution of reservoir or rock properties. Yet, for a long time, we have been using attributes or other features of seismic data to gain useful clues in the interpretation process. Since the 1960s, we have known that reflection amplitude is sensitive to the thickness of thin beds. In the 1970s, bright spots were discovered to be useful in forecasting the presence of gas sands. Then, in the 1980s, amplitude variation with offset (AVO) analysis was identified as an even more refined indicator for gas sands or other situations, giving rise to Poisson’s ratio contrasts. Other examples exist, such as predicting porosity from calibrated acoustic impedance values computed from seismic data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seismic data are routinely and effectively used to estimate the structure of reservoir bodies but often play no role in the essential task of estimating the spatial distribution of reservoir or rock properties. Yet, for a long time, we have been using attributes or other features of seismic data to gain useful clues in the interpretation process. Since the 1960s, we have known that reflection amplitude is sensitive to the thickness of thin beds. In the 1970s, bright spots were discovered to be useful in forecasting the presence of gas sands. Then, in the 1980s, amplitude variation with offset (AVO) analysis was identified as an even more refined indicator for gas sands or other situations, giving rise to Poisson’s ratio contrasts. Other examples exist, such as predicting porosity from calibrated acoustic impedance values computed from seismic data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 94 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seismic data are routinely and effectively used to estimate the structure of reservoir bodies but often play no role in the essential task of estimating the spatial distribution of reservoir or rock properties. Yet, for a long time, we have been using attributes or other features of seismic data to gain useful clues in the interpretation process. Since the 1960s, we have known that reflection amplitude is sensitive to the thickness of thin beds. In the 1970s, bright spots were discovered to be useful in forecasting the presence of gas sands. Then, in the 1980s, amplitude variation with offset (AVO) analysis was identified as an even more refined indicator for gas sands or other situations, giving rise to Poisson’s ratio contrasts. Other examples exist, such as predicting porosity from calibrated acoustic impedance values computed from seismic data.

Key concepts: Amplitude versus offset, Geology, Amplitude, Offset (computer science), Seismology, Seismic to simulation, Poisson distribution, Reflection (computer programming)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Seismic-guided estimation of log properties (Part 1: A data-driven interpretation methodology) — Research Paper | ScholarLens