Reproducibility of a Multi-Stage Near Maximal Treadmill Test for Exercise Tolerance in Angina Pectoris
Paul E. Smokler, Rex N. MacAlpin, Anthony Alvaro, Albert A. Kattus
Abstract
Open-access reader
Paul E. Smokler, Rex N. MacAlpin, Anthony Alvaro, Albert A. Kattus
Abstract
Open-access reader
A retrospective analysis was made of the reproducibility of a treadmill exercise tolerance test performed on patients with angina pectoris to an end point of moderately severe (3+) angina. One hundred and forty tests (70 pairs) in 63 patients were found to meet criteria for inclusion in the study. In 30 patients a comparison of the first test the patient had ever had with a subsequent test revealed a significantly poorer performance on the first test; mean differences ± one standard error of the mean between the first test and the subsequent tests were 0.90 ± 0.20 min of walking from the start of the test to the onset of angina, 2.3 ± 0.33 total min of walking, and 5.8 ± 0.86 "exercise units" attained at the end point of "3+" angina. In 40 patients a comparison of two tests, neither of which was the patients' first test, revealed no significant differences in performance; mean differences between the two tests were 0.20 ± 0.23 min of walking at the onset of angina, 0.11 ± 0.07 min of walking and 0.18 ± 0.15 exercise units attained at the end point of "3+" angina. There were no significant differences in maximum heart rates attained between any of the tests. In using treadmill testing to quantitate exercise capacity in angina pectoris, the first test is likely to yield a poorer performance than subsequent ones. Tests subsequent to the first are highly reproducible when a specifically defined symptomatic end point of moderately severe intensity is employed.
OpenAlex reports 85 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A retrospective analysis was made of the reproducibility of a treadmill exercise tolerance test performed on patients with angina pectoris to an end point of moderately severe (3+) angina. One hundred and forty tests (70 pairs) in 63 patients were found to meet criteria for inclusion in the study. In 30 patients a comparison of the first test the patient had ever had with a subsequent test revealed a significantly poorer performance on the first test; mean differences ± one standard error of the mean between the first test and the subsequent tests were 0.90 ± 0.20 min of walking from the start of the test to the onset of angina, 2.3 ± 0.33 total min of walking, and 5.8 ± 0.86 "exercise units" attained at the end point of "3+" angina. In 40 patients a comparison of two tests, neither of which was the patients' first test, revealed no significant differences in performance; mean differences between the two tests were 0.20 ± 0.23 min of walking at the onset of angina, 0.11 ± 0.07 min of walking and 0.18 ± 0.15 exercise units attained at the end point of "3+" angina. There were no significant differences in maximum heart rates attained between any of the tests. In using treadmill testing to quantitate exercise capacity in angina pectoris, the first test is likely to yield a poorer performance than subsequent ones. Tests subsequent to the first are highly reproducible when a specifically defined symptomatic end point of moderately severe intensity is employed.
Key concepts: Medicine, Angina, Treadmill, Reproducibility, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, Physical therapy