2011Seminars in Vascular SurgeryOpen access

Brachial-Basilic Autogenous Access

Tze‐Woei Tan, Alik Farber

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

The emphasis on autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access has increased the focus on the brachial-basilic autogenous configuration currently recommended by the national guidelines when the cephalic vein is not suitable. The brachial-basilic autogenous access has been extensively studied and compared with both prosthetic (arteriovenous graft [AVG]) and other autogenous accesses. The literature suggests that the brachial-basilic autogenous access is superior to AVGs in terms of patency, reintervention rates, and infectious complications. However, controversy still remains with respect to its role in the treatment algorithm and the technical conduct of the operation. This review will address the ongoing issues and controversies surrounding the brachial-basilic autogenous access and define its role for the hemodialysis access surgeon.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The emphasis on autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access has increased the focus on the brachial-basilic autogenous configuration currently recommended by the national guidelines when the cephalic vein is not suitable. The brachial-basilic autogenous access has been extensively studied and compared with both prosthetic (arteriovenous graft [AVG]) and other autogenous accesses. The literature suggests that the brachial-basilic autogenous access is superior to AVGs in terms of patency, reintervention rates, and infectious complications. However, controversy still remains with respect to its role in the treatment algorithm and the technical conduct of the operation. This review will address the ongoing issues and controversies surrounding the brachial-basilic autogenous access and define its role for the hemodialysis access surgeon.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The emphasis on autogenous arteriovenous hemodialysis access has increased the focus on the brachial-basilic autogenous configuration currently recommended by the national guidelines when the cephalic vein is not suitable. The brachial-basilic autogenous access has been extensively studied and compared with both prosthetic (arteriovenous graft [AVG]) and other autogenous accesses. The literature suggests that the brachial-basilic autogenous access is superior to AVGs in terms of patency, reintervention rates, and infectious complications. However, controversy still remains with respect to its role in the treatment algorithm and the technical conduct of the operation. This review will address the ongoing issues and controversies surrounding the brachial-basilic autogenous access and define its role for the hemodialysis access surgeon.

Key concepts: Basilic Vein, Medicine, Hemodialysis access, Hemodialysis, Brachial artery, Surgery, Vascular access, Cephalic vein

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Brachial-Basilic Autogenous Access — Research Paper | ScholarLens