Correlation of image quality with exposure index and processing protocol in a computed radiography system
Ioannis A. Tsalafoutas, G. A. Blastaris, A. Moutsatsos, P. Chios, EFSTATHIOS P. EFSTATHOPOULOS
Abstract
Ioannis A. Tsalafoutas, G. A. Blastaris, A. Moutsatsos, P. Chios, EFSTATHIOS P. EFSTATHOPOULOS
Abstract
The correlation of image quality with the exposure index (EI) and the processing protocol was investigated in a Kodak computed radiography (CR) system using clinical radiographs and a water phantom containing an aluminium and a copper step-wedge. The phantom was exposed to different dose levels and the acquired images were processed using four clinical protocols. The quality of these images was evaluated in terms of image brightness, contrast and noise. In clinical radiographs, there was no straightforward correlation of image quality with EI. In phantom images, higher EI values improved contrast and reduced noise but after a point this improvement does not justify the implied increase in patient dose. Image brightness, contrast and noise were also strongly dependent on the processing protocol. To obtain the images of satisfactory quality with the Kodak CR system, a dose slightly higher than those used in 400 relative speed screen-film systems and a processing protocol designated for the specific radiographic examination are required.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The correlation of image quality with the exposure index (EI) and the processing protocol was investigated in a Kodak computed radiography (CR) system using clinical radiographs and a water phantom containing an aluminium and a copper step-wedge. The phantom was exposed to different dose levels and the acquired images were processed using four clinical protocols. The quality of these images was evaluated in terms of image brightness, contrast and noise. In clinical radiographs, there was no straightforward correlation of image quality with EI. In phantom images, higher EI values improved contrast and reduced noise but after a point this improvement does not justify the implied increase in patient dose. Image brightness, contrast and noise were also strongly dependent on the processing protocol. To obtain the images of satisfactory quality with the Kodak CR system, a dose slightly higher than those used in 400 relative speed screen-film systems and a processing protocol designated for the specific radiographic examination are required.
Key concepts: Index (typography), Medicine, Library science, Quality (philosophy), History, Computer science, World Wide Web, Philosophy