2007Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana)Open access

Performance evaluation of an ox-drawn ridging plough in a soil-bin.

Stephen Hill Mends Aikins, J. Kilgour

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

An ox-drawn ridging plough was developed using the Godwin-Spoor narrow tine soil force prediction model. The plough was evaluated in a sandy loam soil in the soil-bin at Cranfield University, Silsoe. The objectives were to compare predicted with measured draught and vertical forces, and cross-sectional area of soil disturbance respectively. The experiments were arranged in a randomised complete block design with two blocks including ploughing to the right and left within the soil bin. The plough was run at a speed of 0.7m/s at depths between 0.10 and 0.25m at 0.05m intervals. Each run was replicated eight times. The main instrumentation employed was the extended octagonal ring transducer for soil force measurement. A profile gauge was used for taking soil profiles. The measured draught force was 19.9% greater than the predicted force. This was in good agreement with the narrow tine force prediction theory, which suggests that predicted draught and vertical forces should be within 15 – 20% of measured values. The measured vertical force was 37.1% smaller than the predicted force. This was a less satisfactory measure of agreement between predicted and measured force and may be attributed to the complex geometry of the ridging plough compared with the plane shape of the simple tine as used in the Godwin-Spoor tine force model. The measured area of soil disturbed was 52.3% smaller than the predicted area. This was in good agreement with the area prediction approach.Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana) Vol. 27 (2) 2007: pp. 120-129

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An ox-drawn ridging plough was developed using the Godwin-Spoor narrow tine soil force prediction model. The plough was evaluated in a sandy loam soil in the soil-bin at Cranfield University, Silsoe. The objectives were to compare predicted with measured draught and vertical forces, and cross-sectional area of soil disturbance respectively. The experiments were arranged in a randomised complete block design with two blocks including ploughing to the right and left within the soil bin. The plough was run at a speed of 0.7m/s at depths between 0.10 and 0.25m at 0.05m intervals. Each run was replicated eight times. The main instrumentation employed was the extended octagonal ring transducer for soil force measurement. A profile gauge was used for taking soil profiles. The measured draught force was 19.9% greater than the predicted force. This was in good agreement with the narrow tine force prediction theory, which suggests that predicted draught and vertical forces should be within 15 – 20% of measured values. The measured vertical force was 37.1% smaller than the predicted force. This was a less satisfactory measure of agreement between predicted and measured force and may be attributed to the complex geometry of the ridging plough compared with the plane shape of the simple tine as used in the Godwin-Spoor tine force model. The measured area of soil disturbed was 52.3% smaller than the predicted area. This was in good agreement with the area prediction approach.Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana) Vol. 27 (2) 2007: pp. 120-129

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An ox-drawn ridging plough was developed using the Godwin-Spoor narrow tine soil force prediction model. The plough was evaluated in a sandy loam soil in the soil-bin at Cranfield University, Silsoe. The objectives were to compare predicted with measured draught and vertical forces, and cross-sectional area of soil disturbance respectively. The experiments were arranged in a randomised complete block design with two blocks including ploughing to the right and left within the soil bin. The plough was run at a speed of 0.7m/s at depths between 0.10 and 0.25m at 0.05m intervals. Each run was replicated eight times. The main instrumentation employed was the extended octagonal ring transducer for soil force measurement. A profile gauge was used for taking soil profiles. The measured draught force was 19.9% greater than the predicted force. This was in good agreement with the narrow tine force prediction theory, which suggests that predicted draught and vertical forces should be within 15 – 20% of measured values. The measured vertical force was 37.1% smaller than the predicted force. This was a less satisfactory measure of agreement between predicted and measured force and may be attributed to the complex geometry of the ridging plough compared with the plane shape of the simple tine as used in the Godwin-Spoor tine force model. The measured area of soil disturbed was 52.3% smaller than the predicted area. This was in good agreement with the area prediction approach.Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana) Vol. 27 (2) 2007: pp. 120-129

Key concepts: Tine, Plough, Bin, Loam, Force transducer, Geotechnical engineering, Soil science, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance evaluation of an ox-drawn ridging plough in a soil-bin. — Research Paper | ScholarLens