1992Transactions of the American Fisheries SocietyRequires access

Interactions between Native Brook Trout and Hatchery Brown Trout: Effects on Habitat Use, Feeding, and Growth

L.B. Dewald, Margaret A. Wilzbach

Open publisher page 91 citations

Abstract

Habitat use, feeding behavior, and growth of native brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis and hatchery brown trout Salmo trutta were compared in an experiment in which the two species were held alone and together in laboratory stream channels at 14°C. Microhabitat location and vertical distribution of brook trout within the stream channels shifted in the presence of brown trout, and the frequency with which brook trout initiated aggressive interactions declined. Prey capture rates were higher for brown trout than for brook trout in single- and mixed-species trials, and higher for both species when they occurred alone than when they were together. Brook trout and brown trout in single-species trials maintained weight, but did not grow. In the presence of brown trout, however, brook trout lost weight. Instantaneous growth rates of brown trout in mixed species trials were positive. In the presence of brown trout, 33% of the brook trout contracted the fungus Saprolegnia sp. and died; brown trout were never infected nor were brook trout in single-species trials. If these changes in behaviors and growth rates extend to natural settings in which brook trout and brown trout co-occur, they may contribute to an explanation for the observed decline of brook trout abundance in eastern North America.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Habitat use, feeding behavior, and growth of native brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis and hatchery brown trout Salmo trutta were compared in an experiment in which the two species were held alone and together in laboratory stream channels at 14°C. Microhabitat location and vertical distribution of brook trout within the stream channels shifted in the presence of brown trout, and the frequency with which brook trout initiated aggressive interactions declined. Prey capture rates were higher for brown trout than for brook trout in single- and mixed-species trials, and higher for both species when they occurred alone than when they were together. Brook trout and brown trout in single-species trials maintained weight, but did not grow. In the presence of brown trout, however, brook trout lost weight. Instantaneous growth rates of brown trout in mixed species trials were positive. In the presence of brown trout, 33% of the brook trout contracted the fungus Saprolegnia sp. and died; brown trout were never infected nor were brook trout in single-species trials. If these changes in behaviors and growth rates extend to natural settings in which brook trout and brown trout co-occur, they may contribute to an explanation for the observed decline of brook trout abundance in eastern North America.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 91 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Habitat use, feeding behavior, and growth of native brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis and hatchery brown trout Salmo trutta were compared in an experiment in which the two species were held alone and together in laboratory stream channels at 14°C. Microhabitat location and vertical distribution of brook trout within the stream channels shifted in the presence of brown trout, and the frequency with which brook trout initiated aggressive interactions declined. Prey capture rates were higher for brown trout than for brook trout in single- and mixed-species trials, and higher for both species when they occurred alone than when they were together. Brook trout and brown trout in single-species trials maintained weight, but did not grow. In the presence of brown trout, however, brook trout lost weight. Instantaneous growth rates of brown trout in mixed species trials were positive. In the presence of brown trout, 33% of the brook trout contracted the fungus Saprolegnia sp. and died; brown trout were never infected nor were brook trout in single-species trials. If these changes in behaviors and growth rates extend to natural settings in which brook trout and brown trout co-occur, they may contribute to an explanation for the observed decline of brook trout abundance in eastern North America.

Key concepts: Brown trout, Trout, Salvelinus, Fontinalis, Salmo, Biology, Hatchery, Fishery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interactions between Native Brook Trout and Hatchery Brown Trout: Effects on Habitat Use, Feeding, and Growth — Research Paper | ScholarLens