2006Insect ScienceRequires access

Lack of repellency of three commercial ultrasonic devices to the German cockroach (Blattodea: Blattellidae)

Fangneng Huang, Bhadriraju Subramanyam

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

AbstractThree commercial ultrasonic devices (A, B, and C) were tested for their ability to repel the German cockroach,Blattella germanica(L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), in Plexiglas® enclosures. Device A generated peak frequencies at 26 kHz and 34 kHz, and produced a 95 ± 1 dB sound pressure level (SPL) at 50 cm distance (0 dB = 20 log10[20 μPa/ 20 μPa]). Device B generated peak frequencies at 27 kHz and 35 kHz, and produced a 92 ± 4 dB SPL. Device C generated a wide range of frequencies between 28–42 kHz and produced an 88 ± 2 dB SPL. Ultrasound from any of the three devices did not demonstrate sufficient repelling ability against the German cockroach in the tests. The result failed to provide evidence that ultrasonic technology could be used as an effective pest management tool to repel or eliminate the German cockroach.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AbstractThree commercial ultrasonic devices (A, B, and C) were tested for their ability to repel the German cockroach,Blattella germanica(L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), in Plexiglas® enclosures. Device A generated peak frequencies at 26 kHz and 34 kHz, and produced a 95 ± 1 dB sound pressure level (SPL) at 50 cm distance (0 dB = 20 log10[20 μPa/ 20 μPa]). Device B generated peak frequencies at 27 kHz and 35 kHz, and produced a 92 ± 4 dB SPL. Device C generated a wide range of frequencies between 28–42 kHz and produced an 88 ± 2 dB SPL. Ultrasound from any of the three devices did not demonstrate sufficient repelling ability against the German cockroach in the tests. The result failed to provide evidence that ultrasonic technology could be used as an effective pest management tool to repel or eliminate the German cockroach.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AbstractThree commercial ultrasonic devices (A, B, and C) were tested for their ability to repel the German cockroach,Blattella germanica(L.) (Blattodea: Blattellidae), in Plexiglas® enclosures. Device A generated peak frequencies at 26 kHz and 34 kHz, and produced a 95 ± 1 dB sound pressure level (SPL) at 50 cm distance (0 dB = 20 log10[20 μPa/ 20 μPa]). Device B generated peak frequencies at 27 kHz and 35 kHz, and produced a 92 ± 4 dB SPL. Device C generated a wide range of frequencies between 28–42 kHz and produced an 88 ± 2 dB SPL. Ultrasound from any of the three devices did not demonstrate sufficient repelling ability against the German cockroach in the tests. The result failed to provide evidence that ultrasonic technology could be used as an effective pest management tool to repel or eliminate the German cockroach.

Key concepts: Blattodea, German cockroach, Cockroach, Ultrasonic sensor, Biology, Dictyoptera, Ultrasound, Materials science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lack of repellency of three commercial ultrasonic devices to the German cockroach (Blattodea: Blattellidae) — Research Paper | ScholarLens