2012•Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative performance of silicone rubber insulators with IEC stipulated test methods

N. Vasudev, S. Vynatheya, R.T. Senthilkumar

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

IEC standard 61109/62217 stipulates three alternatives for design tests for polymeric insulators, namely (a) tracking and erosion test(1000 hours), (b) track wheel test (30,000 cycles) and (c) multi- stress ageing test (5000 hours). The minimum requirement for the insulator to comply with the design test is compliance with any one of these tests. However, experience in carrying out these tests in CPRI indicate that the assess the relative merits of the tracking and erosion test and the track wheel test, both the tests were carried out on a 33 kV polymeric insulator. Both the tests were terminated after 1000 hours. The results indicate track wheel test is severe. Analytical tests such as hydrophobicity test, EDX and XRD tests were performed to check the degree of degradation of the insulator material.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

IEC standard 61109/62217 stipulates three alternatives for design tests for polymeric insulators, namely (a) tracking and erosion test(1000 hours), (b) track wheel test (30,000 cycles) and (c) multi- stress ageing test (5000 hours). The minimum requirement for the insulator to comply with the design test is compliance with any one of these tests. However, experience in carrying out these tests in CPRI indicate that the assess the relative merits of the tracking and erosion test and the track wheel test, both the tests were carried out on a 33 kV polymeric insulator. Both the tests were terminated after 1000 hours. The results indicate track wheel test is severe. Analytical tests such as hydrophobicity test, EDX and XRD tests were performed to check the degree of degradation of the insulator material.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

IEC standard 61109/62217 stipulates three alternatives for design tests for polymeric insulators, namely (a) tracking and erosion test(1000 hours), (b) track wheel test (30,000 cycles) and (c) multi- stress ageing test (5000 hours). The minimum requirement for the insulator to comply with the design test is compliance with any one of these tests. However, experience in carrying out these tests in CPRI indicate that the assess the relative merits of the tracking and erosion test and the track wheel test, both the tests were carried out on a 33 kV polymeric insulator. Both the tests were terminated after 1000 hours. The results indicate track wheel test is severe. Analytical tests such as hydrophobicity test, EDX and XRD tests were performed to check the degree of degradation of the insulator material.

Key concepts: Silicone rubber, Test method, Insulator (electricity), Track (disk drive), Test (biology), Structural engineering, Engineering, Reliability engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative performance of silicone rubber insulators with IEC stipulated test methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens