2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

On the importance of model comparison tools for the automatic evaluation of the correctness of model transformations

Steffen Mazanek, Christian Rutetzki

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The transformation judge is a novel system for the automatic evaluation and comparison of model transformations that have been submitted as solutions for common model transformation tasks. Its most important feature is the correctness check that is done by black-box-testing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The transformation judge is a novel system for the automatic evaluation and comparison of model transformations that have been submitted as solutions for common model transformation tasks. Its most important feature is the correctness check that is done by black-box-testing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The transformation judge is a novel system for the automatic evaluation and comparison of model transformations that have been submitted as solutions for common model transformation tasks. Its most important feature is the correctness check that is done by black-box-testing.

Key concepts: Correctness, Computer science, Model transformation, Transformation (genetics), Feature (linguistics), Programming language, Black box, Data mining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the importance of model comparison tools for the automatic evaluation of the correctness of model transformations — Research Paper | ScholarLens