Structure‐Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near‐Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions
Nicolas Luco, C. Allin Cornell
Abstract
Nicolas Luco, C. Allin Cornell
Abstract
Introduced in this paper are several alternative ground‐motion intensity measures ( IM s) that are intended for use in assessing the seismic performance of a structure at a site susceptible to near‐source and/or ordinary ground motions. A comparison of such IM s is facilitated by defining the “efficiency” and “sufficiency” of an IM , both of which are criteria necessary for ensuring the accuracy of the structural performance assessment. The efficiency and sufficiency of each alternative IM , which are quantified via (i) nonlinear dynamic analyses of the structure under a suite of earthquake records and (ii) linear regression analysis, are demonstrated for the drift response of three different moderate‐ to long‐period buildings subjected to suites of ordinary and of near‐source earthquake records. One of the alternative IM s in particular is found to be relatively efficient and sufficient for the range of buildings considered and for both the near‐source and ordinary ground motions.
OpenAlex reports 1071 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Introduced in this paper are several alternative ground‐motion intensity measures ( IM s) that are intended for use in assessing the seismic performance of a structure at a site susceptible to near‐source and/or ordinary ground motions. A comparison of such IM s is facilitated by defining the “efficiency” and “sufficiency” of an IM , both of which are criteria necessary for ensuring the accuracy of the structural performance assessment. The efficiency and sufficiency of each alternative IM , which are quantified via (i) nonlinear dynamic analyses of the structure under a suite of earthquake records and (ii) linear regression analysis, are demonstrated for the drift response of three different moderate‐ to long‐period buildings subjected to suites of ordinary and of near‐source earthquake records. One of the alternative IM s in particular is found to be relatively efficient and sufficient for the range of buildings considered and for both the near‐source and ordinary ground motions.
Key concepts: Ground motion, Scalar (mathematics), Intensity (physics), Range (aeronautics), Seismology, Geology, Incremental Dynamic Analysis, Nonlinear system