1968AAPG BulletinRequires access

Simultaneous Evaporite--Carbonate Deposition ?: ABSTRACT

L. L. Sloss

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It is widely accepted that carbonates, especially where these give evidence of origin as banks or reefs, and the primary evaporites with which they are associated closely, represent two distinct successive phases of deposition: (1) a stage of carbonate bank or reef deposition under conditions of normal marine circulation, followed by, (2) a time of sulfate and chloride accumulation under conditions of restricted circulation. Examples of the application of this concept are found in the literature and in current discussions of End_Page 549------------------------------ the Silurian of Michigan, the Middle Devonian of Alberta and Saskatchewan, and the Permian of Germany, among several evaporite-carbonate complexes. Support for the two-stage concept derives from interpretations of physical relations, geochemistry, the ecologic requirements of contributing organisms, the relative rapidity of evaporite deposition, and the assumed time-stratigraphic significance of extrapolated biostratigraphic data. When the carbonate-first--evaporite-later model is applied to specific cases, at both local and regional scales, there emerge patterns of thickness distribution, water depth, and paleogeography that appear bizarre in view of the epeiric setting of the deposits. Further, demonstrable evaporite-carbonate intertonguing and lateral intergradation require an explanation other than accumulation in two successive, temporally distinct phases. Consideration of diffusion rates compared with discharge rates required for evaporite deposition leads to the development of a model in which the density stratification of the waters is such as to permit the simultaneous deposition of chlorides and biogenic carbonates, including isolated pinnacle reefs, in the same basin, perhaps in close juxtaposition. The concept involved is implicit in several older papers on classic evaporite occurrences. Newer data permit a restatement in more quantitative terms. End_of_Article - Last_Page 550------------

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is widely accepted that carbonates, especially where these give evidence of origin as banks or reefs, and the primary evaporites with which they are associated closely, represent two distinct successive phases of deposition: (1) a stage of carbonate bank or reef deposition under conditions of normal marine circulation, followed by, (2) a time of sulfate and chloride accumulation under conditions of restricted circulation. Examples of the application of this concept are found in the literature and in current discussions of End_Page 549------------------------------ the Silurian of Michigan, the Middle Devonian of Alberta and Saskatchewan, and the Permian of Germany, among several evaporite-carbonate complexes. Support for the two-stage concept derives from interpretations of physical relations, geochemistry, the ecologic requirements of contributing organisms, the relative rapidity of evaporite deposition, and the assumed time-stratigraphic significance of extrapolated biostratigraphic data. When the carbonate-first--evaporite-later model is applied to specific cases, at both local and regional scales, there emerge patterns of thickness distribution, water depth, and paleogeography that appear bizarre in view of the epeiric setting of the deposits. Further, demonstrable evaporite-carbonate intertonguing and lateral intergradation require an explanation other than accumulation in two successive, temporally distinct phases. Consideration of diffusion rates compared with discharge rates required for evaporite deposition leads to the development of a model in which the density stratification of the waters is such as to permit the simultaneous deposition of chlorides and biogenic carbonates, including isolated pinnacle reefs, in the same basin, perhaps in close juxtaposition. The concept involved is implicit in several older papers on classic evaporite occurrences. Newer data permit a restatement in more quantitative terms. End_of_Article - Last_Page 550------------

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is widely accepted that carbonates, especially where these give evidence of origin as banks or reefs, and the primary evaporites with which they are associated closely, represent two distinct successive phases of deposition: (1) a stage of carbonate bank or reef deposition under conditions of normal marine circulation, followed by, (2) a time of sulfate and chloride accumulation under conditions of restricted circulation. Examples of the application of this concept are found in the literature and in current discussions of End_Page 549------------------------------ the Silurian of Michigan, the Middle Devonian of Alberta and Saskatchewan, and the Permian of Germany, among several evaporite-carbonate complexes. Support for the two-stage concept derives from interpretations of physical relations, geochemistry, the ecologic requirements of contributing organisms, the relative rapidity of evaporite deposition, and the assumed time-stratigraphic significance of extrapolated biostratigraphic data. When the carbonate-first--evaporite-later model is applied to specific cases, at both local and regional scales, there emerge patterns of thickness distribution, water depth, and paleogeography that appear bizarre in view of the epeiric setting of the deposits. Further, demonstrable evaporite-carbonate intertonguing and lateral intergradation require an explanation other than accumulation in two successive, temporally distinct phases. Consideration of diffusion rates compared with discharge rates required for evaporite deposition leads to the development of a model in which the density stratification of the waters is such as to permit the simultaneous deposition of chlorides and biogenic carbonates, including isolated pinnacle reefs, in the same basin, perhaps in close juxtaposition. The concept involved is implicit in several older papers on classic evaporite occurrences. Newer data permit a restatement in more quantitative terms. End_of_Article - Last_Page 550------------

Key concepts: Evaporite, Geology, Carbonate, Geochemistry, Deposition (geology), Mineralogy, Mining engineering, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Simultaneous Evaporite--Carbonate Deposition ?: ABSTRACT — Research Paper | ScholarLens