2011Future NeurologyRequires access

Orally Inhaled Dihydroergotamine: Reviving and Improving A Classic

Eric P. Baron, Stewart J. Tepper

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Migraine pathophysiology continues to evolve, and additional therapeutic receptors influencing unrecognized neural networks within the cortex, brainstem and cerebral vasculature likely exist. Following the advent of the triptans, the use of dihydroergotamine (DHE) declined, because of the ease of use and improved side effect profiles of triptans. However, there remain many patients who respond poorly to triptans, yet respond significantly better to DHE. This may be due to the broader neuroreceptor targets that DHE interacts with, as opposed to the selective receptor activity of the triptans. Unfortunately, DHE is still infrequently utilized compared with other acute treatments such as triptans, primarily because of difficulty in administration and physician unfamiliarity and inexperience with its use. However, the new orally inhaled DHE appears to be as effective with a better side effect profile compared with intravenous DHE, thus eliminating the complexities typically associated with DHE administration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Migraine pathophysiology continues to evolve, and additional therapeutic receptors influencing unrecognized neural networks within the cortex, brainstem and cerebral vasculature likely exist. Following the advent of the triptans, the use of dihydroergotamine (DHE) declined, because of the ease of use and improved side effect profiles of triptans. However, there remain many patients who respond poorly to triptans, yet respond significantly better to DHE. This may be due to the broader neuroreceptor targets that DHE interacts with, as opposed to the selective receptor activity of the triptans. Unfortunately, DHE is still infrequently utilized compared with other acute treatments such as triptans, primarily because of difficulty in administration and physician unfamiliarity and inexperience with its use. However, the new orally inhaled DHE appears to be as effective with a better side effect profile compared with intravenous DHE, thus eliminating the complexities typically associated with DHE administration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Migraine pathophysiology continues to evolve, and additional therapeutic receptors influencing unrecognized neural networks within the cortex, brainstem and cerebral vasculature likely exist. Following the advent of the triptans, the use of dihydroergotamine (DHE) declined, because of the ease of use and improved side effect profiles of triptans. However, there remain many patients who respond poorly to triptans, yet respond significantly better to DHE. This may be due to the broader neuroreceptor targets that DHE interacts with, as opposed to the selective receptor activity of the triptans. Unfortunately, DHE is still infrequently utilized compared with other acute treatments such as triptans, primarily because of difficulty in administration and physician unfamiliarity and inexperience with its use. However, the new orally inhaled DHE appears to be as effective with a better side effect profile compared with intravenous DHE, thus eliminating the complexities typically associated with DHE administration.

Key concepts: Triptans, Dihydroergotamine, Migraine, Medicine, Zolmitriptan, Acute migraine, Migraine treatment, Brainstem

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Orally Inhaled Dihydroergotamine: Reviving and Improving A Classic — Research Paper | ScholarLens