2002•Palliative MedicineRequires access

Decision making in terminal care: a survey of Finnish doctors' treatment decisions in end-of-life scenarios involving a terminal cancer and a terminal dementia patient

Heikki Hinkka, Elise Kosunen, U-K Lammi, Riina Metsänoja, Anne Puustelli, Pirkko Kellokumpu‐Lehtinen

Open publisher page 67 citations

Abstract

GOALS: The physicians' decision-making process in terminal care is complex: medical, ethical, legal and psychological aspects are all involved, particularly in critical situations. Here, a study was made of the association of personal background factors with end-of-life decisions. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 300 surgeons, 300 internists, 500 health centre practitioners (GPs) and all 82 Finnish oncologists. The response rate was 62%. Two scenarios were presented: one involving a terminal cancer patient, the other a dementia patient. Sociodemographic factors, general life values and attitudes related to end-of-life care were asked. MAIN RESULTS: In the cancer case (Scenario 1) 17%, and in the dementia case (Scenario 2) 43% of all the respondents chose active treatment. In a logistic regression analysis of treatment decisions in Scenario 1, physician's age, specialty, marital status and attitudes to assisted suicide and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (LST) entered the model. In Scenario 2, the variables were physician's age, physician's own experience of severe disease in the family, attitude to withdrawal of LST and opinion of advanced directives. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors' end-of-life decisions vary widely according to personal background factors. The findings underline the importance of advance communication, making these decisions in accordance with the patient's wishes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

GOALS: The physicians' decision-making process in terminal care is complex: medical, ethical, legal and psychological aspects are all involved, particularly in critical situations. Here, a study was made of the association of personal background factors with end-of-life decisions. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 300 surgeons, 300 internists, 500 health centre practitioners (GPs) and all 82 Finnish oncologists. The response rate was 62%. Two scenarios were presented: one involving a terminal cancer patient, the other a dementia patient. Sociodemographic factors, general life values and attitudes related to end-of-life care were asked. MAIN RESULTS: In the cancer case (Scenario 1) 17%, and in the dementia case (Scenario 2) 43% of all the respondents chose active treatment. In a logistic regression analysis of treatment decisions in Scenario 1, physician's age, specialty, marital status and attitudes to assisted suicide and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (LST) entered the model. In Scenario 2, the variables were physician's age, physician's own experience of severe disease in the family, attitude to withdrawal of LST and opinion of advanced directives. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors' end-of-life decisions vary widely according to personal background factors. The findings underline the importance of advance communication, making these decisions in accordance with the patient's wishes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 67 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

GOALS: The physicians' decision-making process in terminal care is complex: medical, ethical, legal and psychological aspects are all involved, particularly in critical situations. Here, a study was made of the association of personal background factors with end-of-life decisions. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 300 surgeons, 300 internists, 500 health centre practitioners (GPs) and all 82 Finnish oncologists. The response rate was 62%. Two scenarios were presented: one involving a terminal cancer patient, the other a dementia patient. Sociodemographic factors, general life values and attitudes related to end-of-life care were asked. MAIN RESULTS: In the cancer case (Scenario 1) 17%, and in the dementia case (Scenario 2) 43% of all the respondents chose active treatment. In a logistic regression analysis of treatment decisions in Scenario 1, physician's age, specialty, marital status and attitudes to assisted suicide and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (LST) entered the model. In Scenario 2, the variables were physician's age, physician's own experience of severe disease in the family, attitude to withdrawal of LST and opinion of advanced directives. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors' end-of-life decisions vary widely according to personal background factors. The findings underline the importance of advance communication, making these decisions in accordance with the patient's wishes.

Key concepts: Terminal cancer, Terminal (telecommunication), Terminal care, Palliative care, End-of-life care, Medicine, Dementia, Advance care planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Decision making in terminal care: a survey of Finnish doctors' treatment decisions in end-of-life scenarios involving a terminal cancer and a terminal dementia patient — Research Paper | ScholarLens