1993Crop ScienceRequires access

Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population

G.O. Edmeades, J. Bolaños, Martha Hernández‐Rodríguez, S. Bello

Open publisher page 279 citations

Abstract

A shortened anthesis‐to‐silking interval (ASI) in maize (Zea mays L.) is associated with tolerance of stresses which occur around flowering. It is not known if this reflects differences in tassel and ear initiation dates, or in rates of development and growth. We examined these characteristics in selection cycles 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 (designated Cx, where the subscript indicates the cycle number) of the lowland tropical maize population ‘Tuxpeño Sequía’, which was selected recurrently for drought tolerance and whose selection cycles differ for ASL Plants were grown at high plant density and under mild and severe drought stresses that occurred at flowering. Silking was delayed significantly, especially in C0 and C2 under severe drought. Stress treatments did not affect days to 50% tassel initiation, ear initiation, or anthesis. The interval between 50% tassel and ear initiation, the rate of spikelet initiation, and crop growth rate near flowering were unaffected by selection. Per cycle changes were −0.21 d in duration of ear spikelet initiation and −16.9 for spikelet number per ear at 50% anthesis. Selection changed relative growth rates at 50% anthesis by 0.005 d−1 cycle−1 for ears, 0.007 d−1 cycle−1 for spikelets and −0.009 d−1 cycle−1 for tassels. These changes were unaffected by stress level. Eight cycles of selection increased the mean ear and spikelet weights at 50% anthesis by 127 and 173%. The ASI increased rapidly when mean spikelet biomass at 50% anthesis was less than 0.8 rag. Results indicate that a decreased ASI arising from selection in this population is due largely to an increased rate of biomass accumulation per spikelet, and development of fewer spikelets per ear.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A shortened anthesis‐to‐silking interval (ASI) in maize (Zea mays L.) is associated with tolerance of stresses which occur around flowering. It is not known if this reflects differences in tassel and ear initiation dates, or in rates of development and growth. We examined these characteristics in selection cycles 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 (designated Cx, where the subscript indicates the cycle number) of the lowland tropical maize population ‘Tuxpeño Sequía’, which was selected recurrently for drought tolerance and whose selection cycles differ for ASL Plants were grown at high plant density and under mild and severe drought stresses that occurred at flowering. Silking was delayed significantly, especially in C0 and C2 under severe drought. Stress treatments did not affect days to 50% tassel initiation, ear initiation, or anthesis. The interval between 50% tassel and ear initiation, the rate of spikelet initiation, and crop growth rate near flowering were unaffected by selection. Per cycle changes were −0.21 d in duration of ear spikelet initiation and −16.9 for spikelet number per ear at 50% anthesis. Selection changed relative growth rates at 50% anthesis by 0.005 d−1 cycle−1 for ears, 0.007 d−1 cycle−1 for spikelets and −0.009 d−1 cycle−1 for tassels. These changes were unaffected by stress level. Eight cycles of selection increased the mean ear and spikelet weights at 50% anthesis by 127 and 173%. The ASI increased rapidly when mean spikelet biomass at 50% anthesis was less than 0.8 rag. Results indicate that a decreased ASI arising from selection in this population is due largely to an increased rate of biomass accumulation per spikelet, and development of fewer spikelets per ear.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 279 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A shortened anthesis‐to‐silking interval (ASI) in maize (Zea mays L.) is associated with tolerance of stresses which occur around flowering. It is not known if this reflects differences in tassel and ear initiation dates, or in rates of development and growth. We examined these characteristics in selection cycles 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 (designated Cx, where the subscript indicates the cycle number) of the lowland tropical maize population ‘Tuxpeño Sequía’, which was selected recurrently for drought tolerance and whose selection cycles differ for ASL Plants were grown at high plant density and under mild and severe drought stresses that occurred at flowering. Silking was delayed significantly, especially in C0 and C2 under severe drought. Stress treatments did not affect days to 50% tassel initiation, ear initiation, or anthesis. The interval between 50% tassel and ear initiation, the rate of spikelet initiation, and crop growth rate near flowering were unaffected by selection. Per cycle changes were −0.21 d in duration of ear spikelet initiation and −16.9 for spikelet number per ear at 50% anthesis. Selection changed relative growth rates at 50% anthesis by 0.005 d−1 cycle−1 for ears, 0.007 d−1 cycle−1 for spikelets and −0.009 d−1 cycle−1 for tassels. These changes were unaffected by stress level. Eight cycles of selection increased the mean ear and spikelet weights at 50% anthesis by 127 and 173%. The ASI increased rapidly when mean spikelet biomass at 50% anthesis was less than 0.8 rag. Results indicate that a decreased ASI arising from selection in this population is due largely to an increased rate of biomass accumulation per spikelet, and development of fewer spikelets per ear.

Key concepts: Tassel, Anthesis, Biology, Agronomy, Zea mays, Population, Poaceae, Drought stress

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population — Research Paper | ScholarLens