1998Unpublished venueOpen access

Verification of carrier density profiles derived from spreading resistance measurements by comparing measured and calculated sheet resistance values

Robert G. Mazur, S. Ramey, C. L. Hartford, E. J. Hartford, M. Kouno, Leng Seow TAN

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In the past, resistivity and carrier density profiles derived from spreading resistance measurements have been satisfactorily verified by comparing a doped layer’s measured sheet resistance, ρs, with a sheet resistance value calculated from the on-bevel resistivity profile. However, this verification process has been found to fail in the case of ultrashallow (<100 nm) source/drain implants. This paper examines all possible sources of the discrepancy between ρs-measured and ρs-calculated, and concludes that the lack of a sheet resistance edge correction in the standard multilayer SRP analysis is the dominant factor. The paper also discusses the role played by bevel surface damage, on-bevel carrier diffusion, and variations in carrier mobility in high dopant density regions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the past, resistivity and carrier density profiles derived from spreading resistance measurements have been satisfactorily verified by comparing a doped layer’s measured sheet resistance, ρs, with a sheet resistance value calculated from the on-bevel resistivity profile. However, this verification process has been found to fail in the case of ultrashallow (<100 nm) source/drain implants. This paper examines all possible sources of the discrepancy between ρs-measured and ρs-calculated, and concludes that the lack of a sheet resistance edge correction in the standard multilayer SRP analysis is the dominant factor. The paper also discusses the role played by bevel surface damage, on-bevel carrier diffusion, and variations in carrier mobility in high dopant density regions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the past, resistivity and carrier density profiles derived from spreading resistance measurements have been satisfactorily verified by comparing a doped layer’s measured sheet resistance, ρs, with a sheet resistance value calculated from the on-bevel resistivity profile. However, this verification process has been found to fail in the case of ultrashallow (<100 nm) source/drain implants. This paper examines all possible sources of the discrepancy between ρs-measured and ρs-calculated, and concludes that the lack of a sheet resistance edge correction in the standard multilayer SRP analysis is the dominant factor. The paper also discusses the role played by bevel surface damage, on-bevel carrier diffusion, and variations in carrier mobility in high dopant density regions.

Key concepts: Sheet resistance, Bevel, Spreading resistance profiling, Materials science, Dopant, Electrical resistivity and conductivity, Doping, Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Verification of carrier density profiles derived from spreading resistance measurements by comparing measured and calculated sheet resistance values — Research Paper | ScholarLens