Chlamydia trachomatis detection — is it doctor dependent?
Lynn Riddell, Jackie Sherrard
Abstract
Lynn Riddell, Jackie Sherrard
Abstract
The accuracy of tests for chlamydia depends, among other things, upon the quality of the clinical specimen. Most chlamydia tests do not allow comment on specimen quality. It has been shown that examination of Papanicolaou stains or Diff-Quik stains of endocervical secretions can be used to assess the quality of endocervical sampling. This study has found that by analysing surrogate markers, such as the rates of inadequate cervical cytology and chlamydia detection rates in patients not identified as chlamydia contacts, it is possible to identify doctors performing less well in cervical sampling without the need for extra tests.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The accuracy of tests for chlamydia depends, among other things, upon the quality of the clinical specimen. Most chlamydia tests do not allow comment on specimen quality. It has been shown that examination of Papanicolaou stains or Diff-Quik stains of endocervical secretions can be used to assess the quality of endocervical sampling. This study has found that by analysing surrogate markers, such as the rates of inadequate cervical cytology and chlamydia detection rates in patients not identified as chlamydia contacts, it is possible to identify doctors performing less well in cervical sampling without the need for extra tests.
Key concepts: Chlamydia trachomatis, Papanicolaou stain, Medicine, Chlamydia, Sampling (signal processing), Chlamydiales, Chlamydia trachomatis infection, Trachoma