1947•University of Toronto QuarterlyRequires access

The Interaction of Religion and Philosophy

John K. McCreary

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Precise definitions are always difficult, yet for clearness we must attempt, to differentiate philosophy, religion, and the philosophy of religion. Conceivably one could have a philosophy which was non-religious, and a religion which was non-philosophical. This assertion may surprise some persons, yet historically we see a sharp division between philosophy and religion which may be illustrated in the thought of, say, Aristotle and Luther. (We might think also of the strange combination of two contradictory strains in Augustine, the philosophical and the theological. Yet again, in Athanasius, we find a religious rather than a philosophical passion.) Now the philosophy of religion stands as a third factor, as it were, between the other two. It is seen to exist and function in the most varied types of philosophy, seeking to extract a religion from those philosophies or to construct one in consequence of their doctrines or yet again to relate such doctrines to a religion already recognized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Precise definitions are always difficult, yet for clearness we must attempt, to differentiate philosophy, religion, and the philosophy of religion. Conceivably one could have a philosophy which was non-religious, and a religion which was non-philosophical. This assertion may surprise some persons, yet historically we see a sharp division between philosophy and religion which may be illustrated in the thought of, say, Aristotle and Luther. (We might think also of the strange combination of two contradictory strains in Augustine, the philosophical and the theological. Yet again, in Athanasius, we find a religious rather than a philosophical passion.) Now the philosophy of religion stands as a third factor, as it were, between the other two. It is seen to exist and function in the most varied types of philosophy, seeking to extract a religion from those philosophies or to construct one in consequence of their doctrines or yet again to relate such doctrines to a religion already recognized.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Precise definitions are always difficult, yet for clearness we must attempt, to differentiate philosophy, religion, and the philosophy of religion. Conceivably one could have a philosophy which was non-religious, and a religion which was non-philosophical. This assertion may surprise some persons, yet historically we see a sharp division between philosophy and religion which may be illustrated in the thought of, say, Aristotle and Luther. (We might think also of the strange combination of two contradictory strains in Augustine, the philosophical and the theological. Yet again, in Athanasius, we find a religious rather than a philosophical passion.) Now the philosophy of religion stands as a third factor, as it were, between the other two. It is seen to exist and function in the most varied types of philosophy, seeking to extract a religion from those philosophies or to construct one in consequence of their doctrines or yet again to relate such doctrines to a religion already recognized.

Key concepts: Philosophy, Epistemology, Surprise, Philosophy of religion, Assertion, Religious philosophy, Western philosophy, Contemporary philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Interaction of Religion and Philosophy — Research Paper | ScholarLens