2005Geotechnical Testing JournalRequires access

The Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Compaction Verification on a Model Road Pavement

SIK Ampadu, TD Arthur

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Abstract Compaction verification studies were conducted on a model site during a road construction project. Three compaction plants of different capacities were used on model pavements constructed using loose lifts of lateritic gravel measuring 120, 170, and 220-mm thick. After every two passes of the roller the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) test was conducted on the compacted layer alongside the sand replacement test to determine the level of compaction. A correlation was made between the sand replacement and the DCP tests resulting in a calibration equation of the general form log(LC) = κ - λ log(DPI) between the DCP penetration rate, DPI, and the level of compaction (LC) achieved as measured by the sand replacement method. κ and λ were found to be 2.184 and 0.337, respectively. The level of compaction values was back-calculated across the depth of the pavement using the DPIs. These values indicated that the sand replacement method gives the average degree of compaction over the depth tested whereas the DCP test allows the detection of low-level compaction pockets deeper within the layer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Compaction verification studies were conducted on a model site during a road construction project. Three compaction plants of different capacities were used on model pavements constructed using loose lifts of lateritic gravel measuring 120, 170, and 220-mm thick. After every two passes of the roller the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) test was conducted on the compacted layer alongside the sand replacement test to determine the level of compaction. A correlation was made between the sand replacement and the DCP tests resulting in a calibration equation of the general form log(LC) = κ - λ log(DPI) between the DCP penetration rate, DPI, and the level of compaction (LC) achieved as measured by the sand replacement method. κ and λ were found to be 2.184 and 0.337, respectively. The level of compaction values was back-calculated across the depth of the pavement using the DPIs. These values indicated that the sand replacement method gives the average degree of compaction over the depth tested whereas the DCP test allows the detection of low-level compaction pockets deeper within the layer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Compaction verification studies were conducted on a model site during a road construction project. Three compaction plants of different capacities were used on model pavements constructed using loose lifts of lateritic gravel measuring 120, 170, and 220-mm thick. After every two passes of the roller the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) test was conducted on the compacted layer alongside the sand replacement test to determine the level of compaction. A correlation was made between the sand replacement and the DCP tests resulting in a calibration equation of the general form log(LC) = κ - λ log(DPI) between the DCP penetration rate, DPI, and the level of compaction (LC) achieved as measured by the sand replacement method. κ and λ were found to be 2.184 and 0.337, respectively. The level of compaction values was back-calculated across the depth of the pavement using the DPIs. These values indicated that the sand replacement method gives the average degree of compaction over the depth tested whereas the DCP test allows the detection of low-level compaction pockets deeper within the layer.

Key concepts: Penetrometer, Compaction, Geotechnical engineering, Cone penetration test, Geology, Penetration test, Dynamic compaction, Subgrade

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Compaction Verification on a Model Road Pavement — Research Paper | ScholarLens