Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Sternberg Triangular Love Scale
Joseph T. Chojnacki, W. Bruce Walsh
Abstract
Joseph T. Chojnacki, W. Bruce Walsh
Abstract
This study was conducted to assess the reliability and concurrent validity of the Sternberg Triangular Love Scale. From introductory courses in psychology 90 students who were currently involved in dating relationships completed the scale and a group of other measures in reference to their dating partners. The scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency and 2-wk. test-retest reliability, but high subscale interrelatedness. Results supported hypotheses designed to assess the concurrent validity of the Sternberg subscales. Possible explanations for the high interrelatedness between the subscales are discussed.
OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study was conducted to assess the reliability and concurrent validity of the Sternberg Triangular Love Scale. From introductory courses in psychology 90 students who were currently involved in dating relationships completed the scale and a group of other measures in reference to their dating partners. The scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency and 2-wk. test-retest reliability, but high subscale interrelatedness. Results supported hypotheses designed to assess the concurrent validity of the Sternberg subscales. Possible explanations for the high interrelatedness between the subscales are discussed.
Key concepts: Psychology, Concurrent validity, Internal consistency, Scale (ratio), Reliability (semiconductor), Test validity, Test (biology), Validity