1996•Insect Systematics & EvolutionRequires access

Phylogenetic analysis of larval and adult characters of Adephaga (Coleoptera) using cladistic computer programs

Alexander Haas, Rolf Georg BEUTEL

Open publisher page 40 citations

Abstract

Abstract Eighty characters of larvae and adults of 35 adephagan genera, 2 polyphagan genera, and 1 cupedid genus were analyzed using the cladistic computer programs PAUP and MacClade. The analysis resulted in 1961 equally parsimonious trees of 131 steps (minimum length cladogram). The monophyly of Adephaga and of all adephagan families is confirmed. A sistergroup relationship between Gyrinidae and the remaining Adephaga, a sistergroup relationship between Spanglerogyrus and Gyrininae, the monophyly of Dytiscoidea, a sistergroup relationship between Noteridae and the remaining Dytiscoidea, a sistergroup relationship between Hygrobiidae and Dytiscidae, the monophyly of Caraboidea (Rhysodidae and Carabidae), and the monophyly of Harpalinae sensu Crowson (1955) are in agreement with earlier phylogenetic hypotheses by Beutel & Roughley (1988) and Beutel (1992a, 1993, 1995). The sistergroup relationship between Haliplidae and Dytiscoidea and the monophyly of Geadephaga (Trachypachidae + Caraboidea) are in contrast to Beutel (1992a, 1993, 1995). The high number of equally parsimonius trees is largely due to an inconsistent distribution of character states in basal carabid taxa, i.e. reversals and convergencies. Further evidence is needed for a clarification of these systematic problems.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Eighty characters of larvae and adults of 35 adephagan genera, 2 polyphagan genera, and 1 cupedid genus were analyzed using the cladistic computer programs PAUP and MacClade. The analysis resulted in 1961 equally parsimonious trees of 131 steps (minimum length cladogram). The monophyly of Adephaga and of all adephagan families is confirmed. A sistergroup relationship between Gyrinidae and the remaining Adephaga, a sistergroup relationship between Spanglerogyrus and Gyrininae, the monophyly of Dytiscoidea, a sistergroup relationship between Noteridae and the remaining Dytiscoidea, a sistergroup relationship between Hygrobiidae and Dytiscidae, the monophyly of Caraboidea (Rhysodidae and Carabidae), and the monophyly of Harpalinae sensu Crowson (1955) are in agreement with earlier phylogenetic hypotheses by Beutel & Roughley (1988) and Beutel (1992a, 1993, 1995). The sistergroup relationship between Haliplidae and Dytiscoidea and the monophyly of Geadephaga (Trachypachidae + Caraboidea) are in contrast to Beutel (1992a, 1993, 1995). The high number of equally parsimonius trees is largely due to an inconsistent distribution of character states in basal carabid taxa, i.e. reversals and convergencies. Further evidence is needed for a clarification of these systematic problems.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Eighty characters of larvae and adults of 35 adephagan genera, 2 polyphagan genera, and 1 cupedid genus were analyzed using the cladistic computer programs PAUP and MacClade. The analysis resulted in 1961 equally parsimonious trees of 131 steps (minimum length cladogram). The monophyly of Adephaga and of all adephagan families is confirmed. A sistergroup relationship between Gyrinidae and the remaining Adephaga, a sistergroup relationship between Spanglerogyrus and Gyrininae, the monophyly of Dytiscoidea, a sistergroup relationship between Noteridae and the remaining Dytiscoidea, a sistergroup relationship between Hygrobiidae and Dytiscidae, the monophyly of Caraboidea (Rhysodidae and Carabidae), and the monophyly of Harpalinae sensu Crowson (1955) are in agreement with earlier phylogenetic hypotheses by Beutel & Roughley (1988) and Beutel (1992a, 1993, 1995). The sistergroup relationship between Haliplidae and Dytiscoidea and the monophyly of Geadephaga (Trachypachidae + Caraboidea) are in contrast to Beutel (1992a, 1993, 1995). The high number of equally parsimonius trees is largely due to an inconsistent distribution of character states in basal carabid taxa, i.e. reversals and convergencies. Further evidence is needed for a clarification of these systematic problems.

Key concepts: Monophyly, Cladogram, Biology, Cladistics, Zoology, Genus, Taxon, Phylogenetic tree

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phylogenetic analysis of larval and adult characters of Adephaga (Coleoptera) using cladistic computer programs — Research Paper | ScholarLens