2006•Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaOpen access

Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation

Anders Perner, T. Faber

Open full text 98 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stroke volume variation (SVV)--as measured by the pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) system--predicts the cardiac output response to a fluid challenge in patients on controlled ventilation. Whether this applies to patients on pressure support ventilation is unknown. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with septic shock were included. All were on pressure support ventilation, monitored using the PiCCO system and receiving 500 ml of colloid on clinical indications. Arterial pulse contour SVV and the transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac index were measured before and after fluid challenge. RESULTS: Forty-seven per cent of the patients were defined as fluid responders by an observed increase of > 10% in the cardiac index after fluid. Prior to fluid challenge, the cardiac index was lower in responders compared with non-responders (mean +/- SD, 3.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.0 +/- 1.2 l/min/m2, P < 0.01). In contrast, pre-infusion values of SVV were similar between subsequent responders and non-responders (13 +/- 5 vs. 16 +/- 6%, P =0.26). The mean areas under the ROC curves were 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.94) and 0.52 (0.30-0.73) for pre-fluid cardiac index and SVV, respectively, indicating a predictive power of only the cardiac index. CONCLUSIONS: SVV did not predict the response in cardiac output to fluid challenge in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Stroke volume variation (SVV)--as measured by the pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) system--predicts the cardiac output response to a fluid challenge in patients on controlled ventilation. Whether this applies to patients on pressure support ventilation is unknown. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with septic shock were included. All were on pressure support ventilation, monitored using the PiCCO system and receiving 500 ml of colloid on clinical indications. Arterial pulse contour SVV and the transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac index were measured before and after fluid challenge. RESULTS: Forty-seven per cent of the patients were defined as fluid responders by an observed increase of > 10% in the cardiac index after fluid. Prior to fluid challenge, the cardiac index was lower in responders compared with non-responders (mean +/- SD, 3.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.0 +/- 1.2 l/min/m2, P < 0.01). In contrast, pre-infusion values of SVV were similar between subsequent responders and non-responders (13 +/- 5 vs. 16 +/- 6%, P =0.26). The mean areas under the ROC curves were 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.94) and 0.52 (0.30-0.73) for pre-fluid cardiac index and SVV, respectively, indicating a predictive power of only the cardiac index. CONCLUSIONS: SVV did not predict the response in cardiac output to fluid challenge in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 98 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Stroke volume variation (SVV)--as measured by the pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) system--predicts the cardiac output response to a fluid challenge in patients on controlled ventilation. Whether this applies to patients on pressure support ventilation is unknown. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with septic shock were included. All were on pressure support ventilation, monitored using the PiCCO system and receiving 500 ml of colloid on clinical indications. Arterial pulse contour SVV and the transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac index were measured before and after fluid challenge. RESULTS: Forty-seven per cent of the patients were defined as fluid responders by an observed increase of > 10% in the cardiac index after fluid. Prior to fluid challenge, the cardiac index was lower in responders compared with non-responders (mean +/- SD, 3.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.0 +/- 1.2 l/min/m2, P < 0.01). In contrast, pre-infusion values of SVV were similar between subsequent responders and non-responders (13 +/- 5 vs. 16 +/- 6%, P =0.26). The mean areas under the ROC curves were 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.94) and 0.52 (0.30-0.73) for pre-fluid cardiac index and SVV, respectively, indicating a predictive power of only the cardiac index. CONCLUSIONS: SVV did not predict the response in cardiac output to fluid challenge in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cardiac index, Stroke volume, Cardiac output, Septic shock, Pulse pressure, Ventilation (architecture), Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation — Research Paper | ScholarLens