2011New England Journal of MedicineRequires access

Medicaid and Access to the Courts

Sara Rosenbaum

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California could fundamentally alter states' accountability to beneficiaries and providers when their official conduct allegedly violates Medicaid's essential federal requirements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California could fundamentally alter states' accountability to beneficiaries and providers when their official conduct allegedly violates Medicaid's essential federal requirements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Maxwell-Jolly v. Independent Living Center of Southern California could fundamentally alter states' accountability to beneficiaries and providers when their official conduct allegedly violates Medicaid's essential federal requirements.

Key concepts: Medicaid, Supreme court, Accountability, Medicine, Law, Center (category theory), Supreme Court Decisions, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Medicaid and Access to the Courts — Research Paper | ScholarLens