1981Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und HydrographieRequires access

Coral Bioerosion at Enewetak: Agents and Dynamics

Raymond C. Highsmith

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Abstract Significant differences were found in the extent to which massive coral species at Enewetak are excavated by boring organisms:Goniastrea retiformis, 7.9%;Porites lutea, 2.5%; andFavia pallida, 1.2%. While polychaetes constituted the most abundant and diverse group of coral associates, clionid sponges accounted for approximately 70–80% of skeletal damage. Clionid boring rates are initially very high but burrowing ceases when a particular burrow size (˜0.6 cm) or distance from the surface (≦2 cm) is reached. Most coral skeletal excavation occurs within 2 cm of a dead surface. Therefore, bioerosional damage to corals depends primarily on the amount of skeletal surface not covered by live coral tissue. Damage to skeletons is inversely correlated with colony size but is not correlated with coral growth rates or water depth. Massive corals have a potential escape in size from catastrophic bioerosion. Models relating 1) coral growth forms to skeletal density and stability in currents, 2) resistance of coral skeletons to breakage by water movement and suspended rubble, and 3) dead surface area on coral heads to bioerosional damage and consequent probability of detachment from the substrate, are proposed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Significant differences were found in the extent to which massive coral species at Enewetak are excavated by boring organisms:Goniastrea retiformis, 7.9%;Porites lutea, 2.5%; andFavia pallida, 1.2%. While polychaetes constituted the most abundant and diverse group of coral associates, clionid sponges accounted for approximately 70–80% of skeletal damage. Clionid boring rates are initially very high but burrowing ceases when a particular burrow size (˜0.6 cm) or distance from the surface (≦2 cm) is reached. Most coral skeletal excavation occurs within 2 cm of a dead surface. Therefore, bioerosional damage to corals depends primarily on the amount of skeletal surface not covered by live coral tissue. Damage to skeletons is inversely correlated with colony size but is not correlated with coral growth rates or water depth. Massive corals have a potential escape in size from catastrophic bioerosion. Models relating 1) coral growth forms to skeletal density and stability in currents, 2) resistance of coral skeletons to breakage by water movement and suspended rubble, and 3) dead surface area on coral heads to bioerosional damage and consequent probability of detachment from the substrate, are proposed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Significant differences were found in the extent to which massive coral species at Enewetak are excavated by boring organisms:Goniastrea retiformis, 7.9%;Porites lutea, 2.5%; andFavia pallida, 1.2%. While polychaetes constituted the most abundant and diverse group of coral associates, clionid sponges accounted for approximately 70–80% of skeletal damage. Clionid boring rates are initially very high but burrowing ceases when a particular burrow size (˜0.6 cm) or distance from the surface (≦2 cm) is reached. Most coral skeletal excavation occurs within 2 cm of a dead surface. Therefore, bioerosional damage to corals depends primarily on the amount of skeletal surface not covered by live coral tissue. Damage to skeletons is inversely correlated with colony size but is not correlated with coral growth rates or water depth. Massive corals have a potential escape in size from catastrophic bioerosion. Models relating 1) coral growth forms to skeletal density and stability in currents, 2) resistance of coral skeletons to breakage by water movement and suspended rubble, and 3) dead surface area on coral heads to bioerosional damage and consequent probability of detachment from the substrate, are proposed.

Key concepts: Coral, Bioerosion, Porites, Cnidaria, Breakage, Biology, Rubble, Anthozoa

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coral Bioerosion at Enewetak: Agents and Dynamics — Research Paper | ScholarLens