2003Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory MedicineRequires access

Field-testing and validation in a primary care setting of a point-of-care test for C-reactive protein

David Seamark, Susan Backhouse, Roy Powell

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of point-of-care testing (POCT) in primary care has increased. There is a need for high-quality field evaluation of POCT before deployment can be considered. METHOD: A POCT system for C-reactive protein was evaluated in a routine general practice setting. The standard laboratory method was a dry slide method based in a routine hospital laboratory. RESULTS: Scatterplots for both venous and capillary blood POCT system results versus the standard laboratory assay produced correlation coefficients of greater than 0.96. Bland-Altman plots indicated that 95% of venous and capillary POCT results fell within +/-10 mg/L of the mean value with no clinically significant difference from laboratory results. CONCLUSIONS: The POCT system performed reliably in a routine general practice setting with satisfactory performance against an accepted laboratory method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Use of point-of-care testing (POCT) in primary care has increased. There is a need for high-quality field evaluation of POCT before deployment can be considered. METHOD: A POCT system for C-reactive protein was evaluated in a routine general practice setting. The standard laboratory method was a dry slide method based in a routine hospital laboratory. RESULTS: Scatterplots for both venous and capillary blood POCT system results versus the standard laboratory assay produced correlation coefficients of greater than 0.96. Bland-Altman plots indicated that 95% of venous and capillary POCT results fell within +/-10 mg/L of the mean value with no clinically significant difference from laboratory results. CONCLUSIONS: The POCT system performed reliably in a routine general practice setting with satisfactory performance against an accepted laboratory method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of point-of-care testing (POCT) in primary care has increased. There is a need for high-quality field evaluation of POCT before deployment can be considered. METHOD: A POCT system for C-reactive protein was evaluated in a routine general practice setting. The standard laboratory method was a dry slide method based in a routine hospital laboratory. RESULTS: Scatterplots for both venous and capillary blood POCT system results versus the standard laboratory assay produced correlation coefficients of greater than 0.96. Bland-Altman plots indicated that 95% of venous and capillary POCT results fell within +/-10 mg/L of the mean value with no clinically significant difference from laboratory results. CONCLUSIONS: The POCT system performed reliably in a routine general practice setting with satisfactory performance against an accepted laboratory method.

Key concepts: Point-of-care testing, Point of care, Medicine, Medical laboratory, Laboratory test, External quality assessment, Pathology, Biochemical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field-testing and validation in a primary care setting of a point-of-care test for C-reactive protein — Research Paper | ScholarLens