Optical Characteristics of Moth-Eye Structures on Poly(methyl methacrylate) and Polycarbonate Sheets Fabricated by Thermal Nanoimprinting Processes
Hung‐Yin Tsai, Chia‐Jen Ting
Abstract
Open-access reader
Hung‐Yin Tsai, Chia‐Jen Ting
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this study, moth-eye structures on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polycarbonate (PC) sheets are fabricated by nanoimprinting processes and their antireflective characteristics are discussed. Different substrate temperatures and pressures are used to imprint these structures on PMMA and PC sheets. In both cases, transmittance generally increases with imprinting pressure but does not depend obviously on substrate temperature. The antireflectance of the structures improves with increasing substrate temperature and applied pressure. The reflectance of moth-eye structures on PMMA decreases optimally from 8.36 to 4.54% at a wavelength of 550 nm for a pressure of 27 kg/cm 2 , and the transmittance increases from 92.50 to 95.03%. However, for the optimal result of moth-eye structures on PC, their reflectance decreases from 11.48 to 8.56% and their transmittance increases markedly from 89.54 to 93.56%. Moth-eye structures show a greater transmittance improvement on PC sheets than on PMMA sheets owing to the synergy effect of the protrusion shape and the height of the imprinted structures. High and/or sharp structures increase transmittance and decrease reflectance.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this study, moth-eye structures on poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and polycarbonate (PC) sheets are fabricated by nanoimprinting processes and their antireflective characteristics are discussed. Different substrate temperatures and pressures are used to imprint these structures on PMMA and PC sheets. In both cases, transmittance generally increases with imprinting pressure but does not depend obviously on substrate temperature. The antireflectance of the structures improves with increasing substrate temperature and applied pressure. The reflectance of moth-eye structures on PMMA decreases optimally from 8.36 to 4.54% at a wavelength of 550 nm for a pressure of 27 kg/cm 2 , and the transmittance increases from 92.50 to 95.03%. However, for the optimal result of moth-eye structures on PC, their reflectance decreases from 11.48 to 8.56% and their transmittance increases markedly from 89.54 to 93.56%. Moth-eye structures show a greater transmittance improvement on PC sheets than on PMMA sheets owing to the synergy effect of the protrusion shape and the height of the imprinted structures. High and/or sharp structures increase transmittance and decrease reflectance.
Key concepts: Polycarbonate, Transmittance, Materials science, Substrate (aquarium), Methyl methacrylate, Composite material, Poly(methyl methacrylate), Anti-reflective coating