Comparison of the Acute Cardiopulmonary Effects of Oral Albuterol, Metaproterenol, and Terbutaline in Asthmatics
James Wolfe
Abstract
James Wolfe
Abstract
The acute cardiopulmonary effects of oral albuterol, 4 mg, metaproterenol sulfate, 20 mg, and terbutaline sulfate, 5 mg, were compared over eight hours in 20 moderate to severe asthmatics. The magnitude and time course of bronchodilation following albuterol and terbutaline were comparable. Albuterol and terbutaline had a duration of action of at least eight hours and produced significantly greater bronchodilation than metaproterenol from six to eight hours. Metaproterenol produced a greater degree of bronchodilation than albuterol and terbutaline 30 minutes after drug dosing. Significantly fewer patients receiving albuterol experienced one or more central nervous system or musculoskeletal side effects than patients receiving terbutaline. These findings imply possible therapeutic advantages of oral albuterol and terbutaline with respect to dosing frequency, while the more rapid onset of oral metaproterenol suggests that it may have an advantage when used on an as-needed basis.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The acute cardiopulmonary effects of oral albuterol, 4 mg, metaproterenol sulfate, 20 mg, and terbutaline sulfate, 5 mg, were compared over eight hours in 20 moderate to severe asthmatics. The magnitude and time course of bronchodilation following albuterol and terbutaline were comparable. Albuterol and terbutaline had a duration of action of at least eight hours and produced significantly greater bronchodilation than metaproterenol from six to eight hours. Metaproterenol produced a greater degree of bronchodilation than albuterol and terbutaline 30 minutes after drug dosing. Significantly fewer patients receiving albuterol experienced one or more central nervous system or musculoskeletal side effects than patients receiving terbutaline. These findings imply possible therapeutic advantages of oral albuterol and terbutaline with respect to dosing frequency, while the more rapid onset of oral metaproterenol suggests that it may have an advantage when used on an as-needed basis.
Key concepts: Medicine, Terbutaline, Anesthesia, Asthma, Internal medicine